Tuesday, July 7, 2020
Is This Really How I Spent More Than Four and a Half Hours Tonight?
Tonight's Commission meeting got off to a 20 minute late start. Most Commissioners were there, and it was never clear what the delay was about.
I don't know what the "technical" problem was, but it was often difficult to hear what various speakers were saying, because it sounded like someone had a radio blaring throughout. Mac Kennedy eventually said he thought it was coming from his phone, but he didn't know what to do about it. Later, he said it wasn't coming from him, and Roxy Ross said she thought it was interference from the Administration building. It stopped after a couple hours or so.
Ginny O'Halpin seems to know progressively less about how to run a meeting. Discussions about most things are aimless and unfocused.
The "final" auditor's report left more questions than answers.
A discussion about whistleblower protection was endless and without substance. And Sally Heyman, who I presume got as sick of the conversation as I did, wound up recommending that the matter be deferred, "if you doubt your ability to do it." Evidently, they did. They voted it down.
Public comment occurred out of order. Various Village residents are increasingly frustrated that the Commission refuses to replace the INTERIM manager with a PERMANENT manager. It might be worth mentioning that not only is the INTERIM manager not doing a number of parts of his job (a few of them were rehashed during tonight's meeting), but he did not attend tonight's meeting. This is the second meeting he's missed, without reported explanation, out of the past three.
Lots of people are increasingly dissatisfied with WastePro. We would have asked our INTERIM manager more about this problem, and what he's doing to solicit possible replacements, but he wasn't there. So we just complained, and circumlocuted.
The supposed discussion of meeting rules and procedures was a complete mystery. It was never clear what was the purpose of the resolution, or the discussion, and most of the references were fanciful. This was really not about anything. And it never went anywhere.
As the meeting deteriorated into squabbles among Commissioners, this discord, or, as Mac Kennedy called it, a game of "gotcha," infected an otherwise uncomplicated discussion of moving forward with attorney recruitment. Dan Samaria's gambit was to reopen the advertisement for another month. Dan was concerned that we had "only" four applicants, one of whom is our current interim attorney, and whom we already hired once before, until he disagreed with Tracy Truppman about something, so she fired him. But Dan wanted more time. Ginny O'Halpin, who appears to be becoming increasingly hostile, agreed that we should delay. Will Tudor, who likes to present himself as even-tempered and level-headed, but is angry and biting, also agreed to the delay. So, whew, we get a reprieve from having to make a decision.
Then, there was more discussion regarding the rogue INTERIM manager, who is thumbing his nose at everyone. As Roxy Ross pointed out, he doesn't take direction from some Commissioners, most Commissioners, or even all Commissioners. He relies on the support of three Commissioners who are terrified to have to replace him, as they have to do anyway. He just does, or doesn't do, whatever he wants.
Frankly, I lost track of the rest of the meeting. The meeting time was extended twice, my phone was running out of power, and all that seemed to be going on was chit-chat. So I allowed myself to get distracted. Why do I think I didn't miss much?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I realized re-reading this post that my description is as if matters just fizzle out, and little or no conclusion is reached. This is in fact what happens. The leadership on the Commission -- and the drive to do anything -- comes from Roxy Ross and Mac Kennedy, and they take the reins for very brief intervals. But it's not their job, and they try to relinquish something that could be momentum to Ginny O'Halpin, but it just dies there. There is no sustained leadership, unless Roxy or Mac would take control, and keep it. It's just not fair to ask them to do that, since we have someone who is supposed to chair the meetings. And I'm sure each of them probably experiences it as slightly rude to take over for the non-functional chair. So the Village suffers. And we accomplish nothing. That seems to be the safe space for the Commission majority of O'Halpin, Samaria, and Tudor. Just don't do anything. That way, you can't do anything wrong. And besides, none of them has the slightest idea how to do anything. They can't even accept the fact that they're Commissioners, so it's their job to accomplish things, even if they're very unsure of themselves. All three of them should really resign.
ReplyDeleteSimply shocking. Maddening that neither Ginny or Rose were willing to mute their audio for the clarity of the group. What's worse is that they refused to even try. Shows how infallible they think they are. Further, that lack of basic common courtesy says all you need to say about the dysfunction of this group. Rox, Mac are trying to drive in a direction. Dan seems to want to delay or has another direction that I couldn't understand. Ginny's sole job seemed to be reminding people they are on mute and Will only responds with anger when he feels he has been wronged. I forgot Will and Ginny were on the call many times as they had nothing to add to the meat of any matter that was discussed.
ReplyDeleteCan we just not have an acting village manager? He isn't doing the job, why give him the title? Seemed like the Chief has a ton more experience with administration, is David's defacto boss, and would be a much better choice for interim manager.
These people know we can hear and see them and they still behave this way?
Ed Burke would have had that meeting done in less than 30 minutes - with everything completed.
ReplyDeleteJust saying!!!!
John Hornbuckle and that crew used to do these in less than two hours.
DeleteBut the difference is that John took his colleagues into account, and each spoke, more than he did. I gather that was not the deal with Burke. So yeah, Burke could single-handedly dispose of an agenda like that very quickly.
And those were Commissions that could function at all. This one can't. I heard this meeting lasted 5 1/2 hours. (David Raymond sent out something today saying it ended at 12:30. It was supposed to start at 7:00, but it was 20 minutes late.) Every part of this could have been resolved in a reasonable time by any Commission (majority) that had the goal and ability to resolve it. These three (O'Halpin, Samaria, and Tudor) are completely worthless.
By the way, Dan, I'll say to you what I said in public comment to Tracy: "'dictatorship is the most efficient form of government.' It's just not the form of government we have in BP." Although Tracy thought it was. And I gather Burke did, too. If Tracy thought she was a benevolent dictator, you probably think the same was true of Burke. I assume he would have said so, too. If you got on Tracy's bad side, you couldn't have anything: not a seat on a board, or solar panels, or anything. If you got on Burke's good side, you could have a prohibited front yard wall, or anything you wanted.
DeleteAfternoon Dan
DeleteI was looking for some information about Ed Burke
It seems that you may have known him.
He may have been related to my mother .
Thanks
Jim Dooley
JimDooley@jgeorge.org
Again Fred, you don’t know what you are talking about with regard to Ed. Your characterization of him as a dictator is just BS.
ReplyDeletePut up some facts as to the wall situation. In the history of BP, walls and fences were permitted in front yards. When someone on Griffing thought it was a good idea to put a sodden fence on the front property line, then the commission acted to prohibit them in that location. Even then, masonry walls were still permitted.it wasn’t until after Ed had moved out of the Village that the Commission prohibited walls in front yards.
When Burke was Mayor, it was completely acceptable for the Mayor to manage the Village and Ed did so by getting Commission approval when that was the proper way to do something. Variances were the domain of the entire commission, not Ed Burke alone.
Just stop, Fred, you are wrong.
Dan,
DeleteLet's set aside for the moment your seeming mindless reflex to disagree with anything I say, seemingly about anything.
Regarding Burke, I moved to BP in 2005. You can manage the arithmetic well enough to know I wasn't here in Burke's years, and I already said that. I also believe I clearly stated that anything I said about him was based on what I was told by other people. I invited you or anyone else to correct anything I said that anyone believed was not correct. And this conversation did not occur in the comment thread for this post. It was under the "Goodbye, Columbus" post. But whatever bile is upsetting your system has leaked into this thread, too.
At any rate, I asked that anyone who thought or knew different from what I said was welcome to correct. All you did is resist (you gainsaid, but you did not adequately refute), but you did not offer any specifics, as you're now sort of doing (where perhaps people more directly knowledgeable about this than I am won't see what you said). But be that as it may, Janey Anderson said my characterization was either correct, or in line with her memories and experiences. So, if you want to argue facts, why don't you argue them with Janey? Or is the possibly obvious answer to my question that I just said facts, instead of "facts?"
Fred