It was Keisha Lance Bottoms, mayor
of Atlanta, who spoke those words. And
Mayor Bottoms was not the only American local official who expressed exactly
that sentiment.
The death of black American George
Floyd has led over the course of about a week to increasing levels of
bereavement, helplessness, resentment, rage and finally, outburst. The latter
has included looting and wanton destruction.
It wasn’t just George Floyd. It was
all other black Americans killed by police, and by Americans who are not
police, over weeks, and months, and years, and decades, and centuries. Some are
recent and easy to name, and most are more remote and anonymous. Black Americans, and many
other Americans, are “mad as hell, and [they’re] not gonna to take it any more,”
to quote a line from the movie, “Network.”
This week is not the only time the
protest has been like this. Often it’s much less powerful and raging, and
sometimes, it has been like this.
But Mayor Bottoms, who is herself a
black American, and rare other elected officials, have articulated something
important. There’s a difference – and a critical one – between protest, even
borne of intense frustration and anger, and more gratuitous and selfish, or
even antisocial, mischief. The latter occurs under the guise of the former.
Mayor Bottoms recognized that. And she called it what it was.
The same is true of the behavior of
American police. An honest police chief, or an honest president, would say a
version of what Mayor Bottoms said: “This isn’t law enforcement. This is institutionalized racism. It’s arbitrary public
execution. It’s symbolic genocide.”
(Boy, do I hate to dredge this up. I complain vigorously whenever anyone else dredges it up. But the fact is, we in BP have perpetrated our own less murderous version of the same thing. I liked Ray Atesiano. I thought he was a good guy. He was a little out of his depth as police chief, because he wasn't a commanding enough public speaker, and he was too susceptible to the subversive and corrupting influence of people like Larry Churchman. But I did like him. I regret what he allowed to happen to himself. But the buck stopped with him, and that's the way it had to be.)
It wouldn’t be easy for a Caucasian
American person who holds any of the public’s trust to say what needs to be said of the police. And frankly, of Caucasian Americans. I don’t
imagine that it was entirely easy for Mayor Bottoms, who had to have relied on
a lot of support from black Atlantans, just to get elected, and has now told them they’re behaving
like bad children, to have said it.
I doubt it was easy for Colin
Kaepernick to have done what he did. He certainly paid a price for it. I don’t
know if he regrets the “stance” he took, even though he was completely right.
It seems that someone, though, has
to admit that Caucasians in this country have hidden behind a lie. And a scam.
Whether it’s real so-called police, even though some, like the person who
assassinated Philando Castile, tried to claim they’d had inadequate training
(how much training does an armed police officer need not to gun down entirely
innocent citizens?), or chronologically adult children, like George Zimmerman,
who seem to want to be policemen when they grow up (which they never will),
they all need to stop hiding behind the trope about “law and order.” It isn’t.
It’s lawlessness and disorder. It is, as Mayor Bottoms rightly called it,
“chaos.”
I think many white folks would benefit from having Black friends. I think many men would benefit from having women friends (who they aren't trying to boink). I think may straight people would benefit from having gay friends. I think many young people would benefit from having old friends. The list goes on, and every example works the other way, too. Empathy requires us to see what others see ... and to see how those same folks see the world seeing them. I'm an old white guy who experiences white privilege every time I walk out of Home Depot and the security guard doesn't even glance my way while he looks through the bags of Black/Hispanic customers and checks the receipt. I don't even make eye contact as I waltz through like my last name is "Depot." What Black Americans say they experience is real. We need a solution to the problem more than we need a reaction to how the legitimate frustration and anger are vented.
ReplyDeleteI know what you mean, and it's an interesting philosophical question. In my field, it is sometimes proposed that the treater should have something in common with the patient. Like the treater and the patient should both be female, or homosexual, or black, or whatever, so the treater will have proper and adequate empathy for the patient. I personally have always rejected that, and I have thought that if the treater is interested enough, and paying attention, and open to understanding the experience of the patient, that's all that's required, at least of the treater. It may be another matter as to whether the patient might feel somehow too distant, because the patient can observe that the treater does not share certain things, like gender and race. The patient wouldn't know if the treater was homosexual, or abused in childhood, or anything else like that, unless the treater revealed it.
DeleteI have black friends, and women friends, and friends who are "not like me" in one way or another. But in my opinion, that's a result of my openness, not the cause of it.
If white people do not address the racism they inherited from their families of origin and then seek to change the institutionalized racism that pervades our entire system then we are all trapped together in a societal problem that can never be solved.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure you've heard many of the light bulb jokes. Do you know how many psychiatrists it takes to change a light bulb? Only one, but the light bulb has to want to change. As difficult as it might be to shed inherited racism, or any other prejudice, it's impossible if the person doesn't want to let it go. We won't be trapped so much in a "societal" problem as we will in our own laziness, self-absorption, and disinterest. And for those who find ways to ignore the problem, I always at least refer them to Niemoller's famous poem. If they think they can afford not to care about anyone else, they're probably kidding themselves. Or they're making a very foolish bet.
DeleteFor you, Fred, your "openness" have allowed you to have rainbow relationships. For others who aren't so open, "openness" may become the result of proactively broadening their circle. Whether the effect creates the cause or the cause creates the effect, the end result is the same. Regardless, we get to the right place.
ReplyDelete