Wednesday, August 7, 2019
"Why's Everybody Always Pickin' on Me?"
For me, it started with Krishan Manners. I had heard that the WiFi in the log cabin and recreation center has been disabled by the Village. So I asked Krishan about this. He explained that it was a "security" measure. It seems, according to Krishan, that some people have been going around to various municipalities, somehow signing onto WiFi networks, and introducing viruses, and making other mischief. No, it hasn't allegedly happened here, but our Village administration has had to take steps. I suggested that Krishan tell me the now secured password (the other password for guests was secure, too), and I'll sign myself in, and I'll never tell anyone the password. No, Krishan said, this wouldn't be secure enough, either. "They" could get in through my phone. I'm not a techie, but I asked my friend, Chuck Ross, about it, and it didn't make sense to him, either. He said there could be a private network, to which none of us (except everyone who works for the Village) would have access, and a more open guest network, to which people would still need passwords. And this would be good enough. Krishan told me I was "out of line" to complain, and to interpret this as just another in the lengthening line of measures the Village and its Commission have been taking to shut down and shut out non-Commissioner residents. I suggested that Krishan and attorney Rebecca Rodriguez, who was listening intently, were both accomplices, and stooges of Tracy "Big Mama" Truppman. Krishan disagreed. He also chastised me, saying he had always been respectful of me. I told him that in return, I was the last person he finally found a way to alienate. I stuck by him as long as I could.
Then, the meeting started. Dan Samaria wanted to delete the second reading of the budget Ordinance, because important information was missing. Jenny Johnson-Sardella said it would be a bad idea to delay, because we could simply continue the discussion once the information was available, and Big Mama agreed. It was later in the meeting that Jenny wanted to delay discussion of something else, because we didn't have the full information about it. Under the new regime, where non-Commissioner Village residents are boxed out as much as possible, it was not possible to ask Jenny when a discussion should happen, regardless of missing information, and when it should be delayed, because of missing information.
Ah, public comment. Suffice it to say that everyone who commented was disgusted in one way or another. I have no idea why Big Mama takes notes of the comments, since she ignores them, and the unhappy neighbors who make them, anyway. Maybe it's her way of keeping herself awake. If that's what it is, it would be better if she didn't take notes.
Big Mama and her Will Tudor are into lofty ambitions. They want to address areas of perceived vulnerability, like "risk management," and Will's later goal, enthusiastically shared by Big Mama, to address the imperfections and "voids," as Big Mama called them, in our Charter. After over 2 1/2 years, they have still failed to finish a driveway and swale Ordinance, or actually accomplish anything else, but they're looking at a much bigger picture than that.
Dan Samaria got his best opportunity to date to address the mysteriously cancelled meeting of March 5. This was the aborted meeting where Dan and Will, and Jenny told us in April that she was included, too, were told there would be no meeting, because there wasn't a quorum. Except the three of them were a quorum, but no one revealed that to them. Well, Dan just had the hardest time formulating the essential questions: 1) who was Jenny's unnamed person who told her the meeting was cancelled, and 2) why did that person tell the three of them something that wasn't true. But Dan stuck with it, and he stumbled around long enough to get the questions out. 1) Jenny couldn't bring herself to name the actual name, but she said that the only person who gives her information about things like that is the manager. So, that was the answer. It was Krishan Manners who lied to her, and to Dan and Will. It was at least as hard work for Dan to put together the other question: 2) Krishan claimed that there is an investigation going on about this matter (that's true; there is), and he therefore would not be able to reveal why he told three people something that wasn't true. And that was as far as we got.
During public comment, Mac Kennedy made an exquisitely cryptic reference to someone who has applied to be on a Board, but who should really be closely investigated through public records, including court records! He said he couldn't name names, because his partner, Dan Schneiger, really didn't want him being so explicitly outspoken. Mac suggested Commissioners investigate carefully before they place a potentially highly problematic person on a Board. Who knows if Jenny Johnson-Sardella had any idea what Mac was talking about. But she decided approving new Board members might be premature, under the circumstances of Mac's non-revelation. Big Mama, though, reassured her girl, Jenny, that she, Big Mama, had certainly done all the homework she needed to do, and she had no further questions. There was nothing more she needed to know. She was ready to vote. But J-J-J-Jenny and the Boys got cold enough feet to agree to defer this matter to the next Commission meeting. In the meantime, Mac told me he would send all the Commissioners e-mails that would reveal what he thought they needed to know. Well, what all of them except Big Mama needed to know. Big Mama doesn't need to know anything.
One of the complaints made and repeated in public comment was about our current legal advisors. Specifically, people complained about the exorbitant fees charged by our new team, and about the almost uniformly wrong advice we've been getting from Big Mama's new girl, Rebecca Rodriguez. There were suggestions that Rebecca was incompetent, that we were overpaying, and that we should get new counsel. Eventually, it got to be Rebecca's turn to defend herself. But even before she did, it was frankly noteworthy how little reaction Rebecca produced, in the face of being accused and demeaned as she was. Anyone who expected her to flinch, or to be uncomfortable in her chair, or to cry, or to leave the room in embarrassment, was disappointed. And Rebecca's defense was to ignore most of the complaint (most especially the part about all the wrong advice, that was specifically cited by those complaining), and to resummarize her resume. One entry she thought was worth our attention was her inclusion in some group of Florida lawyers. She presented this as evidence of her having been noted as a lawyer of credit and accomplishment. It turns out that the group of which Rebecca was a part had about 50 lawyers in it, and being included in a group like that is about as impressive as someone in banking or finance having the title "vice president." They all do. The janitor is the Vice President of Environmental Maintenance. But the skew for the Village, and for the neighbors complaining, was that they think Rebecca is hired to be the Village attorney. She's not. She's hired to run interference and offer protection for Big Mama. And she reacted as if she felt unfairly picked on.
Big Mama, too, complained about being picked on. She accused Dan Samaria of picking on her, and falsely accusing her of various things. She accused me, and Chuck Ross, of the same thing. She seemed to think it was all so unfair, and unjust, and distinctly undeserved. Big Mama hasn't done anything wrong, and nothing of which she's been accused. We know that, because she told us so.
And to show what a dutiful person she is, she agreed that the Commission should more closely examine things like the exorbitant legal bills she's created. Her first gambit, last month, was just to ask for more money to give her Rebecca. But this month, under heavy pressure from her neighbors, she admitted maybe the Commission should look harder at the expenses. Although it's unclear there's anything to find, since every area of expenditure was explained away. In fact, Big Mama's Rebecca girl said, she has comped the Village some legal time. She just decided that the bill was so high--she's paying close attention, and she's compassionate, that one--that she would just go without charging us for some things. And sure enough, when the bill was closely examined, there were 185 hours of legal time, and Rebecca didn't charge us for three of them. I hope anyone who complained, about Rebecca or about Big Mama, feels suitably humbled by the generosity of this gesture.
And that's how we spent over four hours. Which accomplished nothing. But which will appear on Rebecca's next bill.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Our current "situation" is so absurd it would sound fictional if any of us tried to explain it to an outsider. I've only been around BP for 7.5 years, but that's long enough to appreciate how out-of-place and inappropriate this behavior is. They should be ashamed.
ReplyDeleteTo be ashamed one must first have some level of moral compass. That's clearly lacking in this group!
DeleteThere is one thing they are REALLY good at though.......taking cheap shots at non-commission residents. Used to be that was just from Big Momma and Betsy. Now Krishan and Rebecca have joined the team. Of course they are all the worst kind of cowards in that they do this knowing we can't defend ourselves unless we want to risk Big Momma having her "body guard" escort us out.
Fred, I gave bad intel. there are not 50 but over 150 members on this committee that Rebecca was appointed to, clearly an elite group. I stand corrected. In fact, it’s such an important Committee that neither John Hearn nor John Herin are members. Clearly Rebecca has more credentials than they do. See their mission below, it’s something to stick on your bio because it sounds good and use to fool a few people into thinking that you are special.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.floridabar.org/about/cmtes/cmtes-cm/cmtes001/
The mission of the Governmental and Public Policy Advocacy Committee is to:
• Promote professionalism among lawyer-lobbyists;
• Provide appropriate and applicable legal education on matters of interest to (and tailored especially for) lawyer-lobbyists;
• Provide mentoring and networking opportunities that are not available elsewhere;
• Provide an opportunity for lawyer-lobbyists to stay abreast of and collectively be heard by Florida Bar leadership on various Bar proposals (including proposed rules and ethics opinions) that may affect them.
See Rebecca’s bio below.
http://www.gray-robinson.com/attorneys-professionals/rebecca-a-rodriguez
Rebecca can spin it however she pleases, but she has made a number of blunders, it's on the record and that can't be changed.
On another matter, Tracy has on several occasions taken a shot at Fred and me. It’s typical bully behavior, she goes after us while we are in the audience and can’t defend ourselves. In January when I was shut down from speaking after about 30-40 seconds, she mistakenly took a shot at me while I was still standing at the podium and when I started to address her remarks and continue my statement, she threatened to recess the meeting.
I was also told by one of her friends at the meeting Tuesday, that Rox and I are running the group that is going is being critical of the current Commission, sans Dan and that I was an SOB! She called it a Cabal. I tried to explain to this person that I’m not in charge of anything, but she appeared to be extremely agitated, so I informed her I was not going to engage with her and walked to the other side of the room. Nice friends you have Tracy, first one gets in my face in a threatening manner and the other calls me an SOB.
Anyway, here's a link to the 8/6/19 meeting, caution, don’t watch it if you just ate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQPqGZ9EZCE
Chuck - I'm going to guess that's the same "friend" who said basically the same thing to Bob that night!
DeleteNote the recurring theme in that group that Rebecca somehow thinks validates her....."lawyer-lobbyist". Nothing said about municipal attorney!
Chuck,
DeleteThanks for highlighting the central point. It doesn't really matter what are Rebecca's credentials, and what committees she's on. The fact is that she gets the advice wrong. If none of my patients got better, and most of them died in my care, would anyone care whether or not I was on some medical honor society, or held this or that position? I remember when I was in high school, and the students who applied to the better colleges joined every club they could, to pad their resumes. Apparently, people like Rebecca still do that. I don't know if Rebecca is inexperienced, or not smart, or not interested or motivated. All I know is that she gives us wrong legal advice. That makes her valueless to the Village, although perhaps highly valuable to the person who hired her. Rebecca is not hired to provide reliable legal advice to the Village, in the interest of its functioning. She's hired to protect Tracy, and to translate Tracy's scrappy viciousness into legalese. And she does that.
By the way, I forgot to focus Tuesday night on a point I meant to make. I couldn't do it in three minutes, and I got distracted trying to herd those cats. Tracy's idea of replacing a Village resident-manned Code Compliance Board with an "impartial," as even Gary Kuhl conceded, magistrate could be viewed as making this function less personal. And that would in theory be a good thing. But the problem is that it's Tracy Truppman who wants to do this. Tracy has corrupted the office the Village Manager, and the office of the Village Attorney, and the function of the Code Compliance officer, so that these functions are now more personal, not less personal. Tracy uses these positions to attack people she doesn't like. I would never in a million years entrust to Tracy the responsibility of choosing a magistrate, whom she can control, to replace her neighbors, whom she can't control, when the matter is the possibility of acting out revenges on some of her neighbors. And she has in fact chosen someone. And here's an interesting fact about the person she chose. This woman works for CNM. Someone I know had a formal complaint about the woman's husband, who also works for CNM. It took the person I know 15 minutes to try to explain to Tracy's chosen magistrate why it was a conflict of interest for her to be a magistrate in a matter in which one of the parties was her husband. If it had taken 15 seconds for her to understand this, it would have been way too long. She should have told it to the litigants, instead of the other way around. And this is what Tracy, who's all about personal vendettas, wants the Village to hire to decide who should be excused from paying Code-related fines, and who shouldn't. Tracy has already established a pattern of using the Code officer to go bother people Tracy doesn't like. And now, Tracy wants control over the person who would have to decide whether Tracy's mistreatment of her neighbors was unfair?
Fred
Just to give an example of the Code problem, Tracy has instructed Christina Caserta to cite Mac Kennedy and Dan Schneiger for infractions that didn't exist. Mac and Dan took the matter to the Code Compliance Board. Christina sort of admitted she had made it up, and she got flustered, and she abruptly ended the meeting. But what if there was no Code Compliance Board? What if the person to whom Mac and Dan could appeal was just another lieutenant/stooge of Tracy's? And that person, and Christina Caserta, and Tracy Truppman collude to harass Mac and Dan. What do Mac and Dan do then? Hire an attorney, and have the waste of time and money required to take the matter to the court system? Mac has already had to do a version of that regarding Tracy's friend, Laura Graves. Tracy will have exacted her punishment, for Mac's and Dan's criticizing her, anyway. "The process is the punishment." Tracy gets her fiefdom, her stooges get paid, and Tracy's critics get punished, for nothing except crossing Tracy Truppman. That's why she can't be allowed to make even an otherwise good change to Village functioning. Nothing is good, when it has anything to do with Tracy Truppman. She corrupts everything.
DeleteTo be fair, Rebecca's job is to make money for GR, our law firm. They are a for-profit business. They fairly entered into an agreement with BP that allows them to bill by the hour, and they respond to every inquiry, meeting request and need to prepare, advise and defend. Rebecca and GR are upholding their half of the agreement to the degree required and demanded, with the level of oversight that BP is willing to provide. The fault lies squarely on the five-member commission that selected the firm and agreed to that contract ... and on the village manager that allows the mayor to overstep bounds and pays bills without question.
ReplyDeleteI don't agree with you, Mac. When you're in a profession, like law or medicine, for example, you're expected to do more than pick people's pockets. You're expected to have professional ethics, and know, for example, when you shouldn't do something. I don't think you personally would have any trouble recognizing that Rebecca should not have accepted the task of writing an Ordinance in advance of the discussion that should have preceded it. Even though she can make money for her firm and for herself, she is expected to know when her services are not needed, and to protect the client, even from herself. One complication of what she did is that if anyone except Tracy Truppman (and her stooges who just do what she says without questioning) is on the Commission, neither GR nor Rebecca will be hired by the Village. That's not smart of her. It's not good business.
DeleteYou are correct about writing ordinances that haven't been approved by the entire commission, Fred. In fact, I'll go one further and say that she should tell them NOT to ask her to do that ... not because it will cost money in legal fees but because it violates the rules of the village. The attorney's job is to call balls/strikes and keep them in line from a legal perspective. Rebecca doesn't have the balls to stand up to Tracy and say, "no," but she has no problem telling Dan Samaria how to act and apologizing to the state of FL for Dan's behavior. She's our attorney, not our house mother.
ReplyDeleteMac,
DeleteI don't know what Rebecca told anyone, or if she apologized. She was conspicuously mysterious about referring to positions, but not giving anyone's name or other identifier. For all I know, she made up the entire thing. If anything, and knowing Rebecca and her position as Tracy's agent, I would more likely imagine she "apologized" by saying "yeah, it's that Dan Samaria; we can't keep a leash on him; believe me, he's more unhinged trouble to us than he is to you." I've seen how Krishan treats Dan in meetings, and how Rebecca treats him, as you said, and I deeply doubt Rebecca was in any way apologetic-- as in expressing anything like self-consciousness-- to whatever people she alleges she spoke to.
The Village is being totally scammed and railroaded by Tracy, her Commission girls, Krishan, and Rebecca.
Another example of Rebecca being Tracy's attorney, not the village's.......she kept interjecting herself into the board appointments discussion - trying to make it seem like the portion of the ordinance which requires appointments be made at regular commission meetings somehow meant it had to be that meeting. When that didn't work she kept telling them they could always remove an appointee. They weren't locked in. Never have seen a village attorney advocate for a position as often as she does.
ReplyDelete