Friday, January 5, 2018
It's Time We Changed Our Codes About the Medians
Almost everything in the Village is controlled by Codes, and our public spaces are no exceptions. Although some Village residents complained that we did not hold ourselves as a municipality to the same standards that our Codes say applies to individual residences, the Codes are the same everywhere in the Village, and they're enforced the same everywhere.
The Code for the medians is simple. It has one main feature. No one can park or drive on the medians. Except... People can request, and can be approved for, temporary parking either for themselves or on behalf of someone doing work at their house, assuming the work vehicle can't park on the homeowner's property, driveway, or swale. Also, no one can drive on the medians, and no one can dump garbage on the medians. Some, but not all, of the medians have signs saying you can't drive on them.
But here's the problem. First of all, we do in fact allow temporary parking on the medians, with permission. Second, there are generally not waste receptacles on the medians, except for a few of them that have animal waste stations, and like it or not, people clearly do dump debris in the medians. Third, and perhaps most dispositive, and conspicuous, the medians are not generally developed in any meaningful way. There are plantings on all of them, and those plantings are mismatched trees. The canopy is spotty and incoherent, and there is no understory. The ground cover is ratty grass, weeds, and open dirt. So anyone who assumed that it was OK to drive along medians to pass a car stopped in the street, or over them to make a U-turn, or dispose of something in them, would have little to suggest this kind of usage was unwelcome. Unless there's one of the very infrequent keep-off-the-median signs. Those signs say something, but the evident condition of the medians doesn't seem to support the message written on the signs. "Keep off the medians?" Why?
Now, at risk of harping unbearably, I will say that I have made a kind of campaign of wanting the medians in BP to be more respectable, and some kind of credit to the Village, apart from the mere presence of them, but I've realized I'm talking to myself. I have made very many public pleas for median upgrades, I have leaned hard on the Parks and Parkways Board, and I have even pleaded with the Commission, even when I was a member of it, to create a median plan (really to task P&P to create a plan), so the Village, or even interested and ambitious Village residents, could begin proper development. And all of my pleas have fallen on very clearly deaf ears.
I'm the only one who appears to be interested in this. And I'm only one of about 3000 people who live in the Village. And most of the people who live here own property here, just as I do, so they're potentially, or theoretically, as motivated as I am, and for the same reasons. But very clearly, they're just not.
The medians look awful (I haven't heard anyone who disagrees with that), and the vast, vast majority of VBP residents have no meaningful problem with that. Or if they wouldn't, in a perfect world, prefer that the medians look awful, they're more unwilling to do anything about it than they are to tolerate it.
So I think we should change the Codes regarding the medians. We should take away the few keep-off-the-median signs, allow people to park or drive on them (they're a convenience to use for U-turns, if you can't be bothered to go all the way to the end of the block), and allow dumping of debris there. If it's sort of in piles, WastePro can pick it up on Tuesdays and Fridays. What we've left ourselves at this point is the worst of both worlds: medians that look terrible, but we can't even make them useful.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Fred,
ReplyDeleteHappy New Year! Sometimes you have keep talking about something until you're done talking about it! I agree that we could be much more imaginative about the use of these beautiful spaces we have in our Village. It would be fun to have a revolving community garden or some spaces dedicated to native Florida species plants, etc. Or even as our recent community art involvement-an art space for artists who want to create works in natural environments would be quite wonderful. However, each median has its own specific situation depending on its size and shape, but they are also "owned" in an emotional way by the folks that live on a specific median. We use the median in front of our house for playing ball with the kids on the street, and our 8th Ct folks on the north side and the south side have thrown "median" parties inviting all of the neighbors on the street. Chuck Ross helped us form our block safety groups and that was another event that relied on building the community support in our little 8th Ct neighborhood. When our newest neighbors moved in across the street, ( a young professional couple) they were amazed by the welcome they received in our little community. There is so much to praise about our Village, so I encourage you to keep talking and encouraging everyone to become more involved in planning ways to make it even better, more inclusive, and in ways that foster shared involvement and responsibility. Thanks for being an example of trying to make a difference.
Your friend,
Tom Ferstle
Tom,
DeleteSome excellent ideas, about community gardens, other plantings, more art, and even informal gathering places. Some of us also talked about using one or more of the larger medians for workout stations, as they have in other places in the county nearby. The proposal of a small dog park was floated, too, but as many people as wanted and said they would make use of one, not one of those people ever agreed to have the dog park in "their" median.
But whatever anyone can do requires the blessing of some Commission, and that has always been lacking. Sort of alternatively, the impetus could have come independently from P&P, who could have made such a suggestion to any of the Commissions, but the weight was dead there, too. The problem is one word, and it's the word Mac Kennedy (appearing as if Dan Schneiger) uses below: "vision." There isn't any.
My vision, which had the advantage of not costing the Village any money, was to have P&P give us a plan, unified for all the medians, or variable from one median to another, and the people who live next to the median in question might want to donate plants, or the money to buy them. "Be the first block..." kind of thing. Or even a friendly competition for whose median was best. And I was public about this, too. But, for some never adequately articulated reason, the answer was always no.
Fred
I get your point, Fred. Yup, the medians (and other green spaces) are a disaster, and if there were a plan that could be chipped away at over the years (and that had been started years ago), there would be a marked difference now and moving forward. Progress, one step after another! The sooner we start, the sooner we enjoy that progress. However, having goals (a vision to aim for) and plans to execute to get us there seem to be anathema to BP. That's why so much nothing is accomplished everywhere ... in every department, on every board (or at least those that have members), at every commission meeting, in every corner of this lovely village with so much potential. Vision first (ie "celebrate and cherish and develop our green spaces!"), then a plan for year 1 and through year 5 and so on, with regular tweaks. That's how successful organizations work, from Amazon to teeny, canopied villages full of shiny, happy people.
ReplyDeleteDan? Mac? Dan? Mac? "She's my sister AND my daughter."
DeleteYou could not have said it better. The lingering question is why, so persistently, not? Beats me. Stubbornness and territoriality? Probably. I guess. But that seems so petty for, you know, adults. I just can't understand it.
Anyway, my suggestion now is to give up. I surrender. I recognize myself, and Tom Ferstle, and you, as defeated. Let's just call it what it is. At least we get lots of new parking and U-turn opportunities out of it. And a convenient place to dump trash, so it doesn't have to be on private gardens. If we can't enjoy them, let's at least use them.
Fred
That previous reply was from Mac, not Dan. No clue how that happened on my (Mac's) computer, but if you're going to attack the messenger, it's the loudmouth bearded gay, not the pleasant one.
ReplyDeleteI choose to fight for what's right and what's best in the medians and in the world. As all folks in sales know, "no" doesn't mean no ... "no" means "not yet." It simply means we haven't done the job properly yet.
ReplyDeletePS: Mac again on Dan's account. Damn him for logging onto his email on my laptop. I may never be "me" again!
Mac,
DeleteI'm sending one of my tech savvy friends over to your house to show you how to tell into whose account you're logged, and how to log out.
Fred