Wednesday, January 10, 2018

The Domination Seems to Be Complete.


Last night's Commission meeting had trouble getting started.  It got very bogged down in the most unexpected of places: the opportunity for Commissioners to add or withdraw Agenda items.  There was something strange about that discussion.  It was both wide-ranging and aimless, rambling, meandering, and being generally tangential.  Somehow, parts of the Manager's report, and the Police Chief's report, wound up appearing in the otherwise simple, few second opportunity for a Commissioner to say he or she wanted to add a topic, or withdraw one already in the Agenda.  It was curious what this seeming delay or dodge was about.  It seemed almost as if Commissioners wanted to avoid something.

And then, there was Public Comment.  Oh.  Village resident after Village resident complained, to and about Tracy Truppman, and the Commission that apparently couldn't.  Some complained that the Village was spinning its wheels, not moving or improving itself.  Some said there was no meaningful Code enforcement, and that the appearance and condition of Village properties were suffering for it.  Others criticized Tracy personally, including of committing Charter violations.  And of course, there was mention of Tracy's simply personally commandeering the Village and what is usually its government.  Tracy had only one friend last night, at least among non-Commission Village residents.  Jeff Jones angrily countered written comments from Milt Hunter, who reportedly submitted a damning (of Tracy) letter or blog post, Jeff offering opinions of his own.

The next section of the meeting, which was now over two hours old (up to this point in a normal meeting takes about 20-30 minutes, depending on Presentations) was set aside for Commission responses to resident comments.  Oh, Tracy.  She sat out for a little while, letting Roxy Ross field much of the material, and then, Tracy pounced.  She deftly parried a small collection of the complaints, most of which were directed at her.  Her tactics mostly focused on ignoring those accusations she didn't feel like addressing, simply denying others, and lying about the rest.

One focus mentioned by a few Village residents concerned Tracy's (mis)management of what amounts to hurricane Irma damage.  One particular was Tracy's having taken it upon herself to dramatically increase the amount of money the Village was requesting in aid from the state.  Although Tracy, or any other elected representative, should never do such a thing, in this case, it mattered even more, because we have to match what we're given.  The more Tracy requested, the more we would have to come up with as a match.  Although Tracy had a dodge for that, too.  But the point is that Tracy's flim-flam included the concept of urgency and emergency, for example that she had only 48 hours to make an application to the state.  (One of the accusations Tracy ignored, and not for the first time, is why she didn't call an emergency meeting.)  So part of Tracy's footwork here was to claim she had announced this at a previous meeting (wrong).  But there was an available cure, even last night.  Tracy-- who else?-- hit on the idea that the Commission could retroactively approve, by vote, what she falsely alleges they approved in general conversational consensus whenever she alleges this conversation that never took place took place.

During the discussion of whether or not Tracy committed Charter violations, attorney John Hearn reminded that the first place a Commissioner's alleged Charter violation would be considered would be in the Commission itself.  Roxy Ross pointed out that the current Commission could not be relied upon to give honest consideration to whether or not Tracy committed a Charter violation.  Tracy owns these stooges.  They're not going to criticize her.  And we saw what Roxy meant.  Tracy quickly put together a motion that her application to the state for over $1M was agreed upon by the Commission, and it was in the mouth of puppet Harvey Bilt that Tracy put these words.  The second came from the mouth of puppet Jenny Johnson-Sardella.  Tracy quickly rammed through a vote, with no discussion.  And the vote was quickly 3.  Tracy didn't need to know what Roxy Ross' vote was, and she didn't ask.  But Roxy did take the slightly belated opportunity to ask her Commission colleagues if they had seen the document they just voted to approve.  The dumb, deer-in-the-headlights looks said it all.  So the vote was rescinded, whatever that meant, and we took a "five minute" (about 20 minutes) break, so Harvey and Jenny could actually look at what they just agreed to.  If you want to know if either of them sat at the Commission table, looking at this one page, the answer is no.  Everyone scattered.

And when we reconvened, the room was empty.  All of the non-Commission Village residents had gone home.  All but Chuck Ross, Linda Dillon, and I.  What, really, was the point in staying?  Tracy and  the bobbleheads proved Roxy right, they quickly reconfirmed their original votes, and they moved on to whatever nonsense is now Tracy's driveway Ordinance, although they had trouble taking that up, either.

Everyone now gets it.  Tracy does whatever she wants.  She says whatever she wants.  She now controls three other Commissioners, and whatever sits in the suits of the Village Manager and the Village Attorney.  Poor Janey Anderson.  Now she says she no longer supports Tracy?  Where was that insight on voting day?


8 comments:

  1. Who needs to pay for entertainment when you can go to a Biscayne Park Commission Meeting! A police storage locker filled with possibly thousands of dollars of un-inventoried items, and we cannot seem to spend enough money on our police department and their toys. However, ask for speed platforms, lowering speed limits, and the commission and city manager squawks about the paper work required and not enough money. Driveway code in the making for over two years... COME ON? Possible charter violation with the mayor's actions is a big concern, along with a total lack of code violations coming to the Code Compliance Board per chairman Gary Kuhl. Residents of Biscayne Park need to wake up and start taking action or this will snow ball into a huge problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brad,

      Regarding the whining over not having enough money, let's remember that as minor a gesture as it would be, we have persistently kept our millage at 9.7. This is a meaningless number, and for a community that doesn't have enough money to satisfy the wishes of its residents, or even meet some of its basic needs, it makes no sense not to tax ourselves at least at 10 mills, which is the easy way to do it. The hard way is to go higher by referendum, or do a limited assessment for a particular function, like road repair, drainage, or something else.
      Further, regarding Tracy's comment last night about wanting "grants," such as from the state, grants from the public sector represent someone else's money, paid in taxes and fees. We want to ask for someone else's money, but we don't want to commit our own? Ugh.

      Regarding the endless driveway Ordinance, I plead guilty. It's a very tough issue, with lots of opinion and preference, and it was seemingly impossible to arrive at an Ordinance with which most people could agree. There wasn't even agreement about the broadest themes, such as whether there should be parking in the swales. As a Commissioner myself for three years, I failed to make an Ordinance that worked. We all did. And it may be that some group of electeds is just going to have to do something unpopular. That's OK. We came close in the last Commission. But what's not OK is for one Commissioner simply to commandeer this herself, dismissing the hard work of many other people, and have spineless and thoughtless stooges simply to rubber stamp whatever she wants to do.

      "Snowball into a huge problem?" I think we're there.

      Fred

      Delete
    2. I forgot to mention, Brad, that doing nothing about the driveways is unpopular, too. There's a contingent in the Park that want a better neighborhood, some of them are vocal about it, and improving the neighborhood involves things like upgrading the Codes. But there's another contingent, also vocal, who make clear that all they want is to be left alone. They want no demands made on them, especially if demands involve spending money. It really comes back to the issue we've addressed a number of times: vision. A better, classier, artsier, tidier Park is a vision. A quiet, low-key, retro, modest Park is a kind of vision, too. The prevailing complaint about the current Commission is that it has failed to articulate any vision at all. And it signaled its unwillingness, or disinclination, to do that by not having the de rigueur exercise of a visioning session early on. I, for one, am still at a loss to understand what this Commission is, and what, if anything, it wants. Clearly, Tracy Truppman wants power. That's what she has always wanted. Jenny might want a resume boost. Will probably wants to avoid having to put in more of a driveway on his property. Harvey seems to like to portray perspicacity, and he likes to hear himself talk. But none of this has anything to do with the Park as a municipality, and that's what being an elected official is about. It shouldn't be about anything else.

      Fred

      Delete
    3. Fred, your right... it's not ok for any one commissioner to have that much power over the city manager or police chief, but I have to wonder if the city manager actually did his job, would this still occur? Probably. Most residents are not aware of the problems going on with the city, and residents are very good at sticking their heads in the sand and kicking the can down the road until the problem blows up in their faces, and then someone gets fired. Also, I am really tired of listening to the city and commission use the excuse of Hurricane Irma for not continuing getting their work done. We had tropical storm winds, not even Category 1 speed and we got very lucky two years in a row! BP took a big hit with debris which was primarily due to residents not maintaining their yards and total lack of preparation. It's easy, hurricane season is coming, so you preemptively trim your trees or hire someone to do it. If you can't maintain your property or afford to hire someone to maintain it, then you should not own it. I can't imagine how residents are going to handle a real hurricane, it's not going to be pretty!

      Police Department: I don't think our police department has ever had proper management, independent audits, or any real over sight since I have lived here. I suspect if we hired a consultant to evaluate our police department and it's daily functions, there would be some big changes needed. I am wanting to see Nick succeed, but I believe for anyone to succeed they need to be trained for their position. Who's trained Nick on how to run a police department? I don't want to see us set him up for failure. The population density is increasing all around us with new condos, signs of gentrification, and 125th is starting to progress and become more attractive commercially, which will bring more traffic through BP. We need to have some foresight (dare I say vision) and be ready to deal with more traffic, more people, and potentially more crime.

      Code: It's just a mess and we need to figure this out quick. A lack of violations not coming before Code Compliance tells me Krishan has not trained our full time code officer properly. If Krishan needs assistance to do his job more effectively, he needs to ask for it. As of today, I walked past a couch that has sat on the swale for 4 days. The city needs to remove the debris from the public swale and heavily fine the homeowner. I also believe we need to process our fines in a manner so that we can send them to a collection agency if they are not paid within 120 days. My vision for this community is nothing in particular, just being safe and having maintained properties, the rest will develop on it's own.

      This list goes on, but I don't have time...........!

      Delete
    4. Brad, your analysis is correct, but remember one thing about Krishan. And you're free to criticize him anyway. Tracy has made to clear to Krishan and to John Hearn that if they don't do what she tells them to do, she'll fire them. She demonstrates month after month how sheepish and irrelevant are three of her Commission colleagues, and when she says jump, they don't even wait to ask how high. So whatever you see Krishan do or don't do, you know Tracy has ordered him, and he knows the consequences if he waivers or resists. As I said, you can say he should do what's right for the Village instead of just protecting his employment, and I wouldn't disagree with you. But understand his position. Because Jenny, Will, and Harvey agree to be impotent, they also make Krishan and John impotent.

      That dynamic very clearly applies to Code enforcement, too. Tracy doesn't want the Codes to be enforced, and she communicates this to Krishan. Tracy the autocrat somehow thinks she's a populist, and she thinks she's doing a favor for the weaker Park property owners. And as impotent as Jenny, Will, and Harvey make themselves, leaving Krishan and John impotent, that's how impotent is the Code officer and our Code Compliance Board. You heard what Gary Kuhl said: cases are not coming to the Board, because citations are not being issued.

      Regarding the overall neighborhood, and your point about development, we have a dilemma among Village residents. However many of us agree with you about how good it is to have improvement around us, at the same time, many of us also say what you say about not wanting more traffic. I think we can't have it both ways, and in my opinion, we should welcome more traffic. What we don't want is mischief, but I think we can address that without being more broadly antisocial. Nick gave us a pretty good description of that on Tuesday, in terms of making the stops, and finding the mischief makers. We just have to make the stops.

      Fred

      Delete
    5. Fred, "welcome more traffic".... please clarify? I'm not sure if Tracy has any say on John Hearn's employment, but I have to question her influence on some of the other new commissioners and unfortunately, our police chief.

      Delete
    6. Brad,

      I like BP. I'm proud of it. I'm happy to show off, and I like it if people are comfortable here, even people driving through. So for that reason, I welcome the traffic. In addition, I agree with you that it's nice to have development in the general area. Because I think it's good to have the improvement, then I'm glad for the traffic that comes with a better, more desirable area.

      The Commission hires and fires two positions: the Village manager, and the Village attorney. All other Village employees are hired and fired only by the manager. In theory, and according to our Charter, the Commission has no power to hire or fire anyone other than the manager and the attorney. That includes anyone on the police force, including the Chief. However, a manipulative and power hungry Commission, or Commissioner, can threaten that if the manager does not fire a particular Village employee, or even does not direct a given Village employee to do something, the Commission will fire the manager. You can be very sure that Tracy has made crystal clear to people like Krishan and John Hearn that if they don't do what she says, she will fire them. She can do that, because three other Commissioners will, for whatever are their reasons, go along with anything Tracy says. So Tracy has complete influence on the police chief. "Krishan, I want Nick to do such and such. If you don't have him do it, I'll fire you." And it has become depressingly clear that Krishan has gotten the message.

      Fred

      Delete
  2. Snowball? How about avalanche, we are already buried!
    I've got a lot on my plate this morning work wise, I'll post my comments later today.

    ReplyDelete