Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Poor Judith Gersten

Judith Gersten told us she's lived in BP for 26 years.  And she's seen lots of Commissions come and go.  Some were mediocre, and some were bad.  And none of them did a thing for BP.  Until now.

Judith says the present Commission has done lots of great stuff for BP.  And they're the only ones who ever did.  She didn't specify what this Commission has done, but she was so authoritative about it-- and 26 years is more than long enough to know-- that you just knew she had to be right.

But the thing that really irked Judith was that little and insignificant knot of people who just get up and criticize this wonderful Commission.  Judith made very clear that these whining and angry people most definitely do not represent the residents, and certainly not the voters, of BP.  These people just have bad attitude.  And anyway, what do they know?

Frankly, I suspect Judith might have been talking about people like Mac Kennedy, who's only lived in BP for maybe, what, 4-5 years?  What does Mac Kennedy know about the history of BP and its governments?  You know, Judith made the point that she's not one bit concerned about stuff like bills from attorneys.  "You should be," Mac pointed out.  Judith diplomatically ignored Mac.

Hey, Judith could have been talking about me.  I've only been here for 14 years.  That's just about half as long as Judith has.  Judith has much more perspective than I do.  OK, I myself was a Commissioner, and Judith wasn't, and I was on Planning and Zoning, and the Code review committee, and the Foundation.  But she's been here so much longer, and seen so much more, that I really have to concede to Judith's greater history.

I bet Judith was talking about Chuck and Roxy Ross.  They've only lived here, what, let's see, maybe about 30 years or so.  Why, that's not much longer than Judith has lived here.  And fine, Roxy was a Commissioner for nine years, and Mayor for two, but Judith has been paying attention.  Judith has watched from a distance, and not been distracted by getting all caught up in things, as Roxy has.  And what's the big deal about Chuck?  Is he supposed to get points for being the CrimeWatch chairman for maybe 8-10 years?  Says who?

And who else complains really?  No one.  Well, when I say no one, sure, the Kuhls complain.  But they haven't been here more than maybe, oh, I don't know, 35 years?  All right, fine, so they've seen a bit more than has Judith.  And yeah, Gary Kuhl has been on Code Compliance for years, and is the chairperson.  And he was on the Code review committee for several years.  And Barbara's been on Parks and Parkways for who knows how many years.  And both of them attend Commission meetings, Barbara without fail.  But they're probably just, I don't know, jealous.  Yeah, that's it, they're jealous.  Neither of them has ever been on the Commission.  They just complain about the fine people who are, because they're jealous.

So that's it for the critics.  I mean except for the Andersons.  When did they move in here?  I'd say not more than, oh, 35-40 years ago.  And what do they know about Commissions?  What, because Bob was a Commissioner for 20 years, that means he can tell a good one from all the bad ones?  He was never on a good one.  He sure didn't pick up how good this one is.  Why, it wasn't more than a month ago that Bob was publicly announcing that he had supported this Commission, but they had been a huge disappointment, and he didn't approve of them any more.

And there you have it.  No one else criticizes.  Yeah, OK, so what if Linda Dillon, who never has a bad word, or much of a word at all, to say about anyone, criticizes the only Commission Judith says ever did anything for the Village.  Linda hasn't been on 115th St more than maybe 40 years.  Or so.  It sounds like a lot of time here, but it's somewhat less than twice as long as Judith has been here.  And if you think Linda has seen it all, because she never, ever misses a Commission meeting (Judith more or less never, ever attends Commission meetings), and she's been on Code Compliance for years, you're...hey, you might be right about Linda.

Anyway, Judith told us what's what tonight.  This Commission is the real deal.  They accomplish things, and no other Commission ever has.  And just tonight, for example, we saw what this Commission has accomplished.  We had a presentation from our long time lobbyist, Dave Caserta, and our state Senator, Jason Pizzo, and they told us what they've done, and what they're still working on for the Village.  No, no, that had nothing to do with this Commission, but this Commission expressed appreciation for the accomplishments.  Hey, if you thank someone for doing something, that's just as if you had done it yourself.

And our finance director, Paul Winklejohn, made a presentation.  He let us know how under control are our finances.  Sure, a nod to Roxy Ross, and Chuck Ross, for giving him some vital heads ups, but the person to whom he says he speaks "every day" is Tracy Truppman.  Wait, Tracy calls him "every day?"  That's what he said.  Tracy tried to shut him up, as if there was some problem with her talking to him, taking his time, for which he bills us, every day.

Tracy doesn't like things like this distracting from her real accomplishments.  So, when Dan Samaria had an agenda item to talk about those massive and uncontrolled legal bills, Tracy did what you might expect her to do, to reduce the unnecessary distractions: she tried to get this agenda item pulled.  Hey, no need to be looking into this.  And anyway, if we're questioning legal bills, then we can't do it in front of our attorney (for some reason).  And if we should have an attorney, but we can't look into legal bills in front of the attorney, then it appears we really can't look into legal bills at all.  Like the one Roxy Ross mentioned, for about $4000, representing over 20 hours, IN ONE DAY!  And four of the hours were billed by...our attorney...when she attended a Commission meeting to make a presentation to see if she could get hired.  She billed us for four hours, to attend a meeting that was her job interview.  And two of her associates came with her, and each one billed us separately for the same meeting.  Who can question this?  Well, it appears no one can.  And Judith Gersten is just perfectly fine with that.  And funny enough-- crazy enough-- Judith is...an attorney!  I guess she's an attorney first, and a BP resident and taxpayer second.  What a waste of 26 years.

There was very little on the agenda tonight.  In the old days-- the Mayor John Hornbuckle days-- a meeting like this would have been worth two hours or less.  Tonight, it was around four hours.  And it included accomplishments like Betsy Wise supposedly reporting on her April "branding workshop," but trying to explain why she wasn't actually going to report on it at all.  And arguing over how much we should pay a magistrate we can't hire anyway, because this highly functional Commission never changed the Code to allow for hiring a magistrate.  So that was an empty waste.

Yeah, I guess Judith thought she had a point to make.  She intended to have one.  It just really wasn't clear what it was.  What we witnessed was people who can't get enough of listening to themselves talk, and part of the ongoing collection of distortions, misrepresentations, and outright lies.  Sometimes, it takes a good deal of care, deliberation, and patience to accomplish nothing.  It did tonight.


15 comments:

  1. When I listen to these Commissioners, to Will Tudor and his meaningless and circular fumfering, and to Jenny Johnson-Sardella, Betsy Wise, and Tracy Truppman, who constantly "concur" with each other, it reminds me every time, without fail, of the Woody Allen movie, "Sleeper." There's one scene where Woody Allen, who is impersonating a surgeon, keeps saying the word "structure," clearly because he likes the sound of the word. It has no meaning in the scene. He just likes saying it, and listening to himself say it. If you're one of those people who can find the stomach to come to Commission meetings, think about that next time. See if you see what I mean. Will's empty and stock phrases, and the girls "concurring" with each other. The fact is, if Judith Gersten was remotely right about this Commission, this would be amusing. It would have a kind of weird charm. Instead of representing something like a mugging you can't stop (the mugger has a gun pointed at you, and you're just hoping that you don't lose any more than your wallet), or a kick in the groin. Think about Woody Allen. Don't bother to watch the movie, though, if you didn't see it back in the '70s. It was kind of a dumb and slapstick movie. Like this Commission.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some BP residents have decidedly low standards and expectations for the village. (Keep in mind that many long-term residents pay very little in taxes, so their low expectations are commensurate with their tax bill. Others still expect better even though they pay little, perhaps because they're smarter and more elevated and can see the "big picture.") I'm happy that folks are happy. The village serves their purposes. However, the village should constantly deliver more and better, raising the bar and consequently making more residents satisfied with what they get for their money. That's just good business. I, for one, feel like I overpay for what I get from BP. This year my tax bill will be nearly $10,000. "Hey, Judith: I'll show you mine if you show me yours."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see your point, except... weirdly, most of the complainers, all of whom have been here (far) longer than you, and who pay much lower taxes (do you want to see mine, too? I think my coming bill is about $3100 or so.), are not happy. That's why they're/we're all complaining. Me, Rosses, Kuhls, Andersons, Linda Dillon... If you think we should be asking you what "your" problem is, we already know. We have the same problem. Even though we get off a lot cheaper than you do.

      And it's not just the twisted and self-serving management of the Village. It's the poor results. All that money, so Tracy can hand it over to her assistants (Rebecca Rodriguez, Krishan Manners, Christina Caserta, etc) whose jobs it is to do whatever Tracy says, and protect her? It's not money well spent. We've always had a Village attorney. And we were always at least adequately, if sometimes minimally so, well-represented. Now, we're very poorly represented, and it's costing us more than twice as much. Solar panels on the recreation building and the administration building? Nope. Sorry. That money was given to Rebecca Rodriguez for her to spend her time figuring out how keep Tracy out of Dan Samaria's line of fire. And to make matters as bad as they can be, Dan's complaints aren't frivolous. Dan's right. And he's doing the best he can to represent his constituents, which is everyone who lives and pays taxes in BP. He's the only person on the current Commission who is doing that. Judith probably thinks Dan is just a malcontent and a complainer, too.

      Delete
  3. We keep hearing about this big list of accomplishments but oddly, why not compile that list and post them to this site and show us our error? I did receive a email from Will Tudor and one achievement he did admit to was an investigation into possible unethical behavior relating to this commission. That's one accomplishment, right?
    Here's Will's email for what it's worth.


    William Tudor via villageofbiscaynepark.onmicrosoft.com
    Aug 29, 2019, 8:58 PM (13 days ago)
    to Bradley

    Mr. Piper,

    Your e-mail seems to be based on the incorrect assumption that this matter has not been addressed with the Manager. To automatically assume that I have not researched this matter and had discussions with the Manager is incorrect.The fact is that I have had several conversations with the Manager regarding concerns that I have with the Attorney billing and have publicly stated that the Commission needs to address the matter as soon as possible since this is a serious issue. The only way to adequately address the matter and develop real solutions is to approach it methodically and without bias.

    As for your comment regarding transparency, I have been completely open regarding my conversation with the Manager regarding the cancellation of the May meeting. I am unable to speak to what was said between other Commissioners and the Manager since these were private conversations that I was not a part of. I've also been informed that the County Ethics Commission was, or is currently, looking into the matter and that the Manager and Mayor may be the subjects of the inquiry. However, I am unable to verify this directly with the County Ethics Commission since this is an open matter. Given the above, I personally feel that discussions regarding the May meeting cancellation may be more fruitful once we have the results of this inquiry.

    Furthermore, this is the only inquiry regarding potential ethics violations that I am aware of.


    Sincerely,

    William Tudor | Commissioner

    Village of Biscayne Park

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, Brad (and Will), yes and no. If the investigation is an "accomplishment," it is not an accomplishment that can be credited to the Commission. We would never say that Al Capone "accomplished" the goal of getting the IRS to enforce tax collection. If there is any accomplishment represented by the investigation Will references, it is an accomplishment of the people who complained about the Commission, and reported it to the Ethics Commission. Those are the same people about whom Judith complained.

      Delete
  4. Regarding the budget meeting last night, Jenny SO wanted to vote "no" because of the money being squirreled away in the budgets for professional services and rec center (ie more money for the attorneys and for Betsy's Splash Mountain). Had Jenny reached down and found her sack, Will would have located his, too (or asked Tracy for his balls back). He was hemming and hawing and sweating over his answer before finally voting to approve the budget and voting against the little man in his head who knows better. Only Dan Samaria seems to be producing enough testosterone to do the right thing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh that was quite the show. Jenny and Wil appearing to agonize over their vote but in the end couldn't find the spine to actually do the right thing. And what was it Betsy babbled about? Something about all these eyes that would be watching the expenditures?? Are we freaking kidding? No matter how the finance guy tries to spin it - there is no transparency in setting up contingency funds this way. And - I hope Rox will chime in - I believe Rebecca is wrong (gee, what a shock) in saying that there would need to be the expense of an ordinance to move any monies if there were just one contingency. I believe that could be handled through a budget reconciliation at the end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Quite the show." Yup, that's the way to put it. I love, love, love the Monty Python Cheese Shop sketch. Youtube. Watch it. Yes, the agonizing over this very difficult decision. There was a movie about the quiz show scam, in which the contestant knew the answer in advance, but pretended to wrack his mind trying to come up with it. Oh, the drama.

      But, the fact is, I give both Jenny and Will more credit than you and Mac do. I think they really knew there was a problem, although neither of them is equipped to understand that problem, and I believe they genuinely considered blocking the juggernaut, because something wasn't right. They only know what Tracy tells them, and it slowed them down when you all told them something very different in public comment. They didn't know what to do with the conflict. The question is, what, besides their fear of Tracy, which might be considerable, led them to fold. Maybe Jenny went through the same thing she put Dan through, when she asked him what he wanted that was omitted from the budget. He was out of his depth, and he couldn't answer. Maybe Jenny was afraid that if she voted against, she would be asked to explain to Tracy, which maybe she was not equipped to do. Maybe, maybe, maybe. Tracy is a major bully, and the rest of them got nothin'. Tracy has made clear what happens when you cross her. Apparently, it's an experience some people don't want. I was even wondering what it might cost Rebecca to have told Tracy she couldn't legally ignore Mac's application, and Tracy had to waste all that time pretending to want everyone to see Mac's application, so they could choose someone else already. That's the kind of sass that cost John Herin his job here. Among other things. But Rebecca's been such a good and dutiful girl that I doubt she'll get much consequence. Maybe just a "don't do that again."

      It's a twisted and pathetic mess, and it's perpetrated by twisted and pathetic people.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have to say, I am enjoying the monthly show rotating TT's hand-picked neighbors to speak on her behalf ... and against the loudmouths who deign measure our collective successes and failures. (Yup, the commission's failures are everyone's failures. I'll let them take full credit for successes if/when they happen.) First we enjoyed a loud, combative, red-faced, one-man show from a resident just about stroking out defending her and attacking residents directly. (I hope the cops in the room know CPR in case he does burst a vein next time he takes the stage.) Then, Kate Eaton (now appointed to Charter Review Advisory Board as pay and seemingly a genuinely nice person) naively lamented things like code and permits and rules and such that she thinks are unique to this village while simultaneously singing the praises of all things BP including her neighbor, TT. And now, Judith, who I don't know and can't comment on except that she's a lawyer and certainly seasoned enough to know that we should certainly question things like legal bills that are on course to be over budget in the double digits. She was kinda boring, all things being relative, but she remembered all of her lines. I'll miss the October meeting, but I can't wait for the video to see which vaudevillian clown TT suckers into stepping up next!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kate is an absolutely lovely person but as the wife of the Bishop of the South Florida Episcopal Diocese she ain't gonna stir any pot. I'm guessing go along to get along. And since they've not been involved since moving here all she knows is what Tracy tells her. Her comments on permits were very telling.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I re-introduced myself to Kate after her presentation on BP's code/permitting woes, and I assured her that Denver, CO, does, in fact, have codes and requires permits. She lived there before moving here, and she seemed to think that BP invented the notion of codes and permits and that we somehow use them to make life difficult. She seemed to really believe that, so I made sure she understood that every city in America has code and that they all require permits, lest she think the Charter Review Advisory Board should strike code altogether. Judging by the appearance of her lovely home, she may not need to be wrangled much. However, the shitshow across the intersection could use a queer eye.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Brad, re your email from Will about attorney fees: So, he's concerned and thinks it should be looked into ASAP. His email is dated Aug29, yet just two days ago on Sept10 he let the topic slip right past him without even making eye contact with it. Commissioners who don't question things and allow them to happen in a passive [insert other p-word here if you prefer] way are complicit in those actions, ie guilty in an "accessory" kinda way, IMO. Being a wuss is no excuse.

    ReplyDelete