Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Another Whopper. And the Natives Are Getting Increasingly Restless.


What a mess of a Commission meeting.  It was sort of all over the place.  It started, before the meeting, with an agenda that was completely unmanageable.  How, and why, that very obvious fact didn't occur to the manager and the mayor, who typically put together the agenda, is unexplained.  Normally, with a normal manager and mayor, someone would stop loading an unmanageable agenda.  But the manager and mayor not being normal, that's not what happened.

Then, we started the meeting.  It was a rambling and disorganized affair, and the Commissioners couldn't really figure out how to handle it.  Betsy Wise announced at the outset that she had to leave by 9:00, because she couldn't get a babysitter (it's too bad no one told Betsy when she ran that meetings would occur on a totally predictable basis, and that no one should be on the Commission, if they couldn't clear the time to attend meetings), and there were occasional references to aiming certain parts of the excessive agenda to early enough that Betsy would be there to vote.  It didn't successfully enough happen, but that was the metronome for the first half of the meeting.

Interestingly, one of the first pieces of business was an attempt, again, to derail Dan Samaria's wish to address a problem with the Commission.  Specifically, the problem was with Tracy Truppman.  Tracy, her new girl Rebecca Rodriguez (supposedly the Village's attorney), and even our state Representative, Dotie Joseph, worked to curb Dan and his interest in good government.

We then had some presentations, which took up time.  The auditors let us know that our audits are done, which Tracy interpreted to mean that Village finances never functioned properly until she got on the Commission.  This is standard material for Tracy.  There was some more blah, blah, blah until we got to the two Ordinances.

Ordinance #1 should never have been presented.  The procedure was entirely wrong, not to mention that no speaker from the audience approved of it in any way.  It took us almost 40 minutes to agree that putting it on the agenda was faulty, and to redirect the content of it to a discussion item, which is what it should have been all along.  The person who reportedly put it there-- attorney Rebecca Rodriguez-- was raked considerably over the coals by non-Commissioner Village residents, but she could never admit she had made a mistake.  And the fact that she charged us for the work she should never have done also did not concern her.  She was pressed as to how many $225 hours she put into this wrong Ordinance, and she tried to hide.  She sort of copped to what sounded like about 5-7 hours.  But it was hard to tell.  Anyway, the whole matter was a total and expensive waste.

Ordinance #2 was related, as it turns out, to Ordinance #1, because it was about overages in our legal expenses for this year.  Although Tracy's attorney, Rebecca Rodriguez, tried to focus on the extra expense of having to appeal the denial of our application for FEMA reimbursement, speakers from the audience pointed out two problems.  One was that Gray Robinson told us that we would only be billed for one attorney, but in fact, we were billed for three at a time.  As Roxy Ross illustrated it, before the current GR crew, John Herrin billed us for an average of 3.75 hours per meeting, which included preparation and attendance.  The new crew, either because there were three of them, or because they're inept and inefficient, billed us for 14.5 hours for the March 19 meeting.  To put it slightly differently, we paid $842 for legal services for meetings that involved John Herrin, and $3252.50 for the March 19 meeting.  And then, there were the other legal bills, for April.  The meeting on April 2 resulted in a bill for three attorneys and 10.8 hours, and cost us $2430.  Conference calls between the staff of attorneys and Tracy Truppman consumed 1.8 hours on 3/21 (two attorneys, total $405), 2.4 hours on 4/1 (three attorneys, total $540: not an April Fool's joke), 3.8 hours on 4/16 (three attorneys, total $855), 3.7 hours on 4/18 (two attorneys, $832.50), and 3.7 more hours on 4/26 (three attorneys, another $832.50).  These conference calls all included the two or three attorneys, Tracy Truppman, and the Village manager.  And there were other billing irregularities.

But the other problem was this.  Not only did Gray Robinson bill us excessively, and not only did Tracy Truppman apparently rely extremely heavily on seemingly endless legal advice (not shared with the Commission, much less the rest of us), but it turned out, as a few Village residents pointed out, that the advice was wrong.  Some of it was illegal.  The attorneys, who, with Tracy Truppman's great encouragement, have their hands very deep in the Village's pocket, don't seem to know what they're doing.  They're not up on the law and applicable statutes.  But of course, Tracy Truppman doesn't hire them for that.  She hires them, at our expense, to run interference for her.  Which they do.

So, the Commission, mostly Will Tudor, patted itself on the back, and thought it had made a wonderful accomplishment, when it agreed to extend the Village's coffers by $15K, instead of the $50K of our money Tracy was trying to give away.  And that $15K concession was on condition that we not do some other project that was going to cost $20K.  That money, too, is now earmarked for Tracy's legal stooges.

We didn't really do anything else.  There wasn't time.  What we were shown was a level of arrogance and contempt for the Village and its residents never before seen here.  Dan Samaria was trying to oust Tracy as mayor.  But Tracy ain't goin' nowhere.  She loves this gig.  And she likes feeling so generous with other people's (our) money to impress her new girls.



20 comments:

  1. What a hot mess we've got. Crossing fingers that there's some intervening force to at least remove Tracy (maybe more?). And Betsy has never had any interest in being a commissioner... that much is obvious at every meeting. I admit to being very wrong about about Dan. Prior to and during the election, I did not support him, but he has shown himself to be the ethical and honest one looking out for the residents and the Village. He's now the only reliable voice of reason up there!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fred,
    You forgot the mention on how Tracy directed the village manager to utilize 20k from our already budgeted money specifically for digitizing our records. Which in my opinion was a very poor and short sighted decision. By digitizing our records, the cost for public records would greatly decrease and the time frame to provide these records would be shortened. Why is it that the village has a tendency to always be reactive instead of proactive? And further more to line the pockets of account churning, unprepared, and probably unethical attorneys. Why is it that this commission has run off almost every professional that it employs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think I forgot that, Jared. I just didn't specify the $20K were supposed to be for digitizing records.

      Delete
    2. Jared - they've been talking about digitizing records for years. It always seems to be one of the first areas they grab money from. And with this bunch.......the last priority on their list would be that which would make public records more accessible.

      Delete
  3. Brian - lots of us are right with you when it comes to Dan. I was extremely critical of him during the campaign and election and now am happy to say I was wrong. He truly is the only one on that dais with morals, ethics and a freaking backbone.

    He made a motion at the beginning of the meeting to move that overreaching board ordinance because Tracy had not followed proper procedures - it needed to be a discussion item and get commission consensus prior to going forward with an ordinance. Well of course Wil, Jenny and Betsy will never cross Tracy especially if it means siding with Dan. So they spend 40 minutes more or less on that ordinance only to end up doing exactly what Dan said they had to do. So in addition to however many hours Rebecca worked on it she gets paid for the meeting time that was wasted. Just like Gray Robinson got paid for the meeting time that was wasted on the variance that was heard but shouldn't have been at the March 19th meeting. Oh but according to Rebecca it is mostly the residents fault with all those emails and ethics complaints that get forwarded to Rebecca that are the cause of blowing the $75,000 legal budget.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was the point I was trying to make, Janey. Rebecca has allowed herself to think the bad guys are "the residents." Rebecca is hired by Tracy, to serve Tracy, and I'm sure she understands that. The same is true of Krishan. And they both know what happens (to them) if they don't do whatever Mama tells them to do. Each of them is paid nicely, with our money, to obey Mama. Neither of them wants to let that money get away.

      Delete
    2. Fred,
      When Rebecca first came on board, I wrote an e-mail asking her to call me so we could discuss a few issues. She responded that she was aware I had a political agenda and it would not be appropriate for her to speak to me. (Clearly Tracy had already poisoned her mind against me and Rox, among others, from the get-go) Further, she indicated that she doesn't represent us, the residents individually, only the Commission. I wrote back that I never suggested that she represents us individually, but us meaning the residents of the Village as a whole. I also made the point that the Charter indicates she represents the Village and the Commission. Spoiler Alert: I never heard back from this last exchange.
      Now it's clear that she represents Tracy first, possibly the Commission second and the Village, "us residents" not at all. My conclusion being, she views Tracy as equal to the Commission and the Commission as equal to representing the Village. She doesn’t seem to understand or care that Tracy does not represent the entire Commission and the Village must be protected from the Commission or members of the Commission it they are not acting in the best interests of the Village.
      Does she not see how obvious her bias towards “us residents” is?

      Delete
    3. Chuck,

      I'm sure she 1) sees, but 2) doesn't care. She makes money off the Village, and the one person who controls her employment is Tracy. She knows that. Krishan knows it. Rebecca has one client: Tracy Truppman. Everyone knows this. The question you might ask is why the two attorney Commissioners don't care about this. They would have more influence (if either of them cared about the Village, wanted anything adaptive for it, and wanted to be influential) if they were independent of Tracy.

      Fred

      Delete
    4. By writing agenda item 9a before it was properly vetted by the entire commission (per our COO or Charter, whichever applies), Rebecca was complicit in the violation. It's her job to ensure that DOESN'T happen, not to be actively involved in it ... even if she was specifically tasked with the job of writing it. I want to know if she took that upon herself or if someone told her to do it ... and who. I don't believe she's allowed to take that direction from the mayor, and if Krishan did it that's a different issue. Regardless, Rebecca is now actively engaged in circumventing (at best) or outright violating (at worst) the way things are supposed to be done. Staring to look like Rebecca is now an adversary of this village ... and by village, I mean the institution of this village and it's rules, procedures and norms.

      Delete
    5. Mac,
      "Yes, you are correct sir"
      You hit the nail on the head, the Attorney is supposed to be the voice of reason, the parliamentarian not complicit with the inmates. Creating billable hours to draft an Ordinance without the consent of the Commission, "You can't be serious. Letting Tracy stay in the room and preside over the discussion after she recused herself, "C'Mon Man". Blame the residents for an increase in legal fees complaining like a hysterical adolescent to justify drafting an unnecessary budget amendment. Do I need to go on? She is over her head and doesn't have the experience to be a lead Village attorney.

      Delete
  4. This is what we get for commission short sighted enough to hire an attorney with ZERO city attorney experience. The closest she gets, according to her bio, is governmental litigation. For sure not the same thing. And it shows. Every step of the way with her errors both of omission and commission.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is what we get for electing this Commission. Anyone who expected better was not thinking straight. An attorney with "ZERO city...experience" was hired by Commissioners with ZERO municipal experience. As I say, what did anyone expect? And add to it that the Commissioners are undilutely full of themselves, with neither BP experience nor demonstrated interest in the Village. As Mac Kennedy once said, we got the government we deserve.

      Delete
    2. Fair enough and agreed.....except for Dan.

      Delete
    3. Dan did not have my support when he ran, and he didn't deserve my support. He ran scared, as a Tracy protegee, and he refused any Meet the Candidates event.

      Since he's been on the Commission, he is by far the most worthy and legitimate Commissioner, because he is the only one who cares about the Village and about legal process. He needs help, he knows that, and he appropriately asks for it. He is the only one who challenges what is wrong. In the last meeting, Jenny and Will claimed to have had doubts or concerns about something, but they did not challenge it. And they only raised their alleged concerns after some of us in the audience pointed out the problem. Or was it Dan who pointed out the problem? Anyway, they're all useless, except Dan. None of them has any idea what he or she is doing, none of them cares one bit about the Village, and none of them should be there. Except, as you say, Dan.

      Delete
  5. Tracy is a danger to our civil liberties and to the village Charter, and she needs to be removed from her position as mayor if not removed from the commission entirely. And, Krishan Manners is negligent in his duties and has been effectively neutered by Tracy's TNR campaign, so he needs to be fired if he can't locate his testicles. At this point, every commissioner who even looks the other way is complicit, in my opinion, and also needs to go. When Jenny and Will both as much as say, "I recognized that this item was on the agenda in violation of our Charter but I voted to keep in on anyway," that means they are violating the Charter at least indirectly. To me, that's as bad as Tracy putting the item on the agenda in violation, the attorney allowing it and even writing the item and billing us for it, and the manager not removing it himself. The way I see it, Tracy violated the Charter putting in on the agenda in her name, Krishan violated the Charter by allowing it to remain, the attorney violated the Charter by writing the item and not advising Tracy/Krishan to remove it prior to the meeting, and Jenny/Will violated the Charter by voting to keep the item on the agenda. A total of five people either directly or indirectly violated our Charter, if I'm understanding correctly. Dan Samaria is the only person on the dais who said "violation," and Betsy was smart enough to keep her mouth shut on the topic, although I'm rather certain she voted to keep the item on the agenda, too. (Did she understand the violation or is she just that clueless, even though she's a lawyer/comic/communications pro?)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mac, you and Janey are totally correct. When it was time for possible deletions from the agenda, and Betsy did not ask any questions about this issue, that was her endorsement to leave it there.

      The further problem is that we have every reason to assume that the girls, if not Will, too, talked about this Ordinance privately, out of the Sunshine, so to them, it was not an issue that had not been discussed. It wasn't discussed in a regular Commission meeting. It was discussed in a private Commission meeting. Those are the ones that are not noticed, to which the public are not invited, and for which no minutes are kept. And if it wasn't that, and if any of these other so-called Commissioners paid any attention to the agenda, and asked any questions about it (like their alleged concern about this proposed Ordinance), then it was Krishan who functioned as a conduit.

      Delete
  6. Never one to let Tracy down Betsy also voted in favor of keeping that ordinance on the agenda.

    Tracy is also a threat to our financial condition. There have been times in past years the legal services budget has been exceeded but never anything even close to this. And, never because commissioners and the manager are passing along significant numbers of emails for the attorney to handle and respond to. And all those conference calls with 2 and 3 attorneys. How damn dare she piss away our money to feed her freaking ego. If I understood correctly Gray Robinson is also hiring outside counsel. I remember back when John Hearn was our attorney. If he had to hire outside counsel he came in front of the commission, told them why and who the person or firm was and the approximate cost. It wasn't some unilateral decision.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Brian, to tag onto your comments about Dan Samaria:
    I, too, did not support or vote for him when he ran for commission, and I've told him so ... not because of any positions he held, but because he allied himself with a group (Betsy, Will, that Manny guy) that I felt was being disingenuous about its claims to represent "integrity & ethics," as stated on an enormous "campaign headquarters" sign on Betsy's front porch (which coincidentally sits directly across the street from the main entrance to the BP voting poll). That kinda grossed me out, and I'd never even met her (and never did until after she was sworn in, despite several attempts to meet with her and give her a fair shake, which she ignored). Yuk. I held up a photo of that sign (can't upload it here) at Tuesday's commission meeting as a reminder to Betsy and Will about that promise they made and have failed to uphold in the most egregious (and unsurprising) fashion. Those three folks (Betsy, Will, that Manny guy) duped Dan Samaria, and we all saw that as clear as day even though he couldn't in his fervor to calculate a way onto the dais. (Worth mentioning that I don't think Manny or Will are bright or crafty enough to dupe anyone, so I'll give Betsy credit for that maneuver ... or whoever pulls Betsy's puppet strings.) Today, I fully support Dan Samaria, and if the election were today, he'd get my vote. He's the best we got in the current clown car.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "An attorney with "ZERO city...experience" was hired by Commissioners with ZERO municipal experience. As I say, what did anyone expect?" Fred, interesting comment and kind of ironic considering....

    ReplyDelete