Tuesday, November 7, 2017

An Attempt to Share Values


The way it was told to me, it started with Janey Anderson, seemingly representing some others of our neighbors, approaching Mac Kennedy.  Mac had been unloading on "Nextdoor" about the Village's failure of "vision," and Janey reportedly contacted him to ask him to present his idea of vision, to a small group of BP residents with whom Janey was apparently having a parallel discussion.  So Mac met with the group, several times, and all of them composed a document to share with the neighborhood, by sharing it first with the Commission.

For what it's worth, the group Janey represented came to include Linda Dillon, Nicole Susi, Brian McNoldy, Brad Piper, and Art Gonzalez.  Mac was included in the final grouping, as was Dan Schneiger.  I'm told their strategy to go public with this was to divide themselves up into single person or two-person task forces, and each person or pair of people would approach a Commissioner.  So one or two of them would approach Tracy Truppman, one or two Roxy Ross, one or two Jenny Johnson-Sardella, one or two Will Tudor, and one or two Harvey Bilt.  The purpose of these outreaches was to inform the assigned Commissioner of this group effort, offer to explain it, and ask each Commissioner to co-sponsor a presentation of it.

Here are the two problems.  First, only Roxy Ross would even listen, look, or discuss the matter with whoever approached her.  The other four Commissioners ignored, blocked, or refused any effort to talk to him or her about it.  Apart from Roxy, we're talking about four new Commissioners who ran explicitly, and reassuringly, on a promise that now, with a new posse in town, Village residents would finally-- oh, yes, finally!-- be listened to.  There would be no more ignoring them, not listening to what's important to them, and "legislating" in spite of them.  Well, we've already been given several doses of what the fulfillment of that promise looks like, and several of our neighbors have just gotten a booster.  The message was clear: drop dead; no one cares what you think, or how much effort you might have expended; and most certainly no one cares about your vision for the Village, or your suggestion that anyone else form a vision for the Village; we only care what we think.  That was problem number one.

Problem number two was what happened to Roxy Ross' placement of this matter on the Agenda for the Commission meeting.  This group of new Commissioners has already deflected a suggestion for a visioning session (an exercise all or most Commissions do at the beginning of a new term).  They neither have nor want a vision.  But now, Roxy has imposed on them their neighbors' serious request, and they, or maybe just Tracy, have found it a little too delicate just to file it in the circular file, as they do with most or all of what Roxy tries on her own to introduce.  It's the kind of initiative that any other Commission would list as "New Business," for inclusion in the 12 section, with an expectation of Commission discussion, and possible voting or other action.  But that, too, was too much dignity to give this group of neighbors, so the matter was placed as a "Presentation," at the beginning of the meeting.  That way, Tracy and the bobbleheads could "listen" (zone out), thank the group for its thoughtfulness, and move on, without any discussion or real and meaningful consideration.

This is an interesting and different Commission.  It is unique in its refusal to acknowledge or honor anything past Commissions have done, anything its neighbors think or want, and even rules of government.    It's really been one bullish, insular, and autocratic move after another that have defined the attitude of the majority of the current Commission, from day one.

So the matter was heard as a Presentation.  Even critics agreed it was a wonderful and carefully crafted presentation.  Each member of the group read his or her part, until the whole project was shared with a room full of people.  At the end of the presentation, Janey Anderson suggested to Her Majesty, the Most Powerful Empress Truppman, that the group could maybe take comments or questions from the room full of people.  But Her Majesty was entering intense deflection and destruction mode, and she refused to permit such an activity, on her personal time.  She partially relented, though, and she agreed, reluctantly, that during the next section of the meeting, Public Comment, anyone in the room full of people could then make comments or ask questions, and the group could answer them.  But when people actually did ask questions or make comments, the Omnipotent, and now annoyed, Empress refused to allow the group to respond.  So the "discussion" moved to the Commissioners.

The group had asked really only for one thing.  That was that the Commission lend its endorsement to an imminent series of wider public conversations, to which Commissioners were enthusiastically invited, and then, perhaps the Commission would like to take up some of whatever turned out to be salient issues.  Roxy Ross thought this was a fine idea.  The rest of them retreated to sputtering, blustering, and drooling down their shirts.  Jenny Johnson-Sardella and Harvey Bilt generally didn't seem to like the idea, and both of them went on about some grossly irrelevant nonsense having to do with this informal group's not being a proper Board.  So what?  They never said they were.  And then, they added equally vapid dodges about how sudden this was, and what an unthinkable idea it would be to try to plan public gatherings, near, um, Thanksgiving.  Will Tudor could find a way to accept people's talking about things, but he, too, thought this was just too abrupt.  He thought maybe after the first of the year.  Her Highness, thought that was pushing it, too, and suggested maybe let's say spring.  Neither Will nor the Empress specified which year they were considering.

No, they were all just disinclined.  Except Roxy Ross, but she doesn't count.  But the fearless group "wouldn't take 'no' for an answer," one of them said, and they pressed and finally "won" permission to have two meetings in the recreation center, and have the fee to hold those meetings waived.  Unanimously?!  I wouldn't say so.  La Truppman and her sidekick Harve stuck to their guns.  But our new we-don't-care-what-VBP-residents-want-or-think-and-we-will-never-listen-to-them Commission only agreed to allow meetings to be held (as if they could stop anyone from having meetings), and a bare majority of them agreed that the fee could be waived.  Big whoop.  We can shut you down now, or we can shut you down later.

It was clear what kinds of values were shared by a group of eight of our neighbors,  Some others expressed values of their own, in reaction to the presentation the eight made.  And everyone had a reasonable point.  The "values" of our new Commissioners?  Tracy values absolute power.  Jenny values her resume.  Will is still trying to protect himself from having to create a driveway.  And Harvey found an easy way to get himself a Commission seat, which means who knows what to him.  But none of them value anything that is connected to Biscayne Park.







17 comments:

  1. When I first heard about this when Rox was contacted before the meeting my thoughts were what a positive thing this was to do by this group of residents. Seemed like a no brainer to me, let them have a go at this and let's see where it goes.
    I was under the impression that Will was open to listening to the concept and he gave positive feedback at the meeting. He did want to defer it till early next year because of the holidays, hurricane issues, etc. after hearing from the other three but not to kill the idea. I don't agree with your position on the placement in the agenda, I thought it was a good idea to have it placed in the beginning of the meeting with more people in attendance. Your concerns are valid as it could have ended up with no discussion but as it turned out with some prompting from the crowd and Rox's support we ended up with significant discussion and were able to witness what you described in your post. It was another example of poor leadership on Tracy's part as this could have been a fairly short discussion to waive the rental fee at the rec center and let the group do it's thing hopefully with greater participation from the community, but nooooooo! Well Jenny clearly didn't seem to have any real interest in what they had accomplished but voted with Will and Rox so she didn't look like a real jerk. So hats off to Rox and Will for doing the right thing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chuck,

      Of course it was a no-brainer. And that was the easy way out of a protracted mess last night. Tracy could properly have limited the presentation to itself last night, then generously thanked the group, enthusiastically have agreed to more public discussion sessions, and asked the group to save its fielding of comments and questions for those sessions. The Commission had no business telling the presenters, and the rest of BP, that they should all be planning and cooking Thanksgiving dinners, and they have no time to attend meetings. It was bizarre over-reach, and it was at the very least a gross failure of "leadership." Unfortunately, not only do Tracy's three pets not show any meaningful independence (I hear what you're saying, but Will doesn't show me anything of value yet), but even Krishan seems to have folded. The problem is that none of them except Rox has any business being there, they have no identifiable agenda, and all Tracy ever does is Tracify everything. Or steamroll what she can't coopt.

      The fact is, I didn't even agree with every position the group took, but they were bold and helpful to do it, and it deserves to proceed unimpeded, to find its own conclusions, now with the invited input of everyone in BP. And that more than includes people like Charlie Easton, and David Raymond, and anyone else who wants to provide some tempering and an expanded view of the neighbors here. It was an excellent conversation, or the start of one.

      Fred

      Delete
  2. I'm very frustrated. One BP resident who was not only at the meeting last night, but also a member of the eight-resident group, wrote to me to tell me I got two things wrong in this report. This resident would not allow me to use his or her name. The two areas of criticism were 1) that "it took some extra time, but all of the Commissioners, Mayor included, did meet with one or more of us," and 2) that it was the group itself that requested placement of the matter early, as a Presentation, instead of having it fall victim to occurring late in a meeting in which most audience members would typically have lost interest and left.

    Two people told me independently that no one but Roxy Ross would listen to the advance pitch. If it's true that despite what I was told by these two people, all Commissioners did in fact agree to hear their neighbors out, it is still noteworthy that the Presentation was sponsored by only member of the Commission. It could have been sponsored by more than one Commissioners, all Commissioners, or it could have been listed without sponsorship, as are many "Presentations." And if the conclusion is that all Commissioners might possibly have been pitched, but only one was interested, that was made clear last night. It is also noteworthy that this post was published last night, and since then, no Commissioner (other than Roxy Ross) has communicated with me to say that he or she had indeed agreed to be pitched.

    As for where on the Agenda to place the matter, I can see why the group members might, in theory, have preferred early, when there would likely be less commitment through discussion, than late. Of course, it's noteworthy that the Mayor promised audience and group discussion anyway, then reneged.
    When one of the group members told me about this matter some days before the meeting, and that the matter would be listed as a Presentation, I told him or her about my concern as to what this meant. He or she did not tell me that the group actually preferred or requested placement as a Presentation.

    So I'm at a bit of a loss, and I frankly resent that someone would tell me I got something wrong, but not be willing to say that more publicly, either by posting a comment to that effect, or even by asking me to cut and paste something. As I said to the correspondent in question, if I'm wrong, everyone needs to know that. It does a disservice to BP neighbors to allow me to be incorrect, and not provide a correction. Unless I witness something, I'm at the mercy of what I'm told. And readers of these posts are at the mercy of what I tell them. It's important that I be factually correct, and that I be publicly corrected when I'm not.

    I acknowledge the communication I received, and if it is correct, I apologize for my errors. But I am not yet persuaded that I was wrong, since there is no evidence of it.

    Fred

    ReplyDelete
  3. It sounds like the initial circumstances you were informed of may have changed prior to the meeting and I don't know who ultimately decided the position in the agenda, but what does it matter now. The gist of your post is what matters, Rox and it appeared that Will as well were the only two that gave the presentation and concept any weight, that was clear. People pretend to listen and some people actually listen. I think Christy said it well last night, most people have a number of thoughts going on in their heads the purpose of which is to respond to what someone else is saying. I think I heard it phrased as people think at 1000 to 3000 words a minute, so to your point, and at any rate the bottom line is, it's clear that at least three of the five weren't really interested in what this group had to say.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wrote a response but never posted it, Fred, because the commission will be holding a "special" meeting to discuss it again tomorrow night, Tuesday. Apparently the village attorney conducted some additional research about the advice he gave the commissioners, which they need to consider. Let's see what happens tomorrow night.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You need to redeem the office 2013 product key before you can begin downloading the software on your device. For this, visit the office setup and select ‘redeem product key'.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The cash app login account is one of the most promising and easiest ways to send, spend, save and invest your money and it is the safest and free mobile banking app that is user-friendly too. It is a well-known peer-to-peer payment app that is formally known as Square cash.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello there! This post could not be written any better!
    Looking at this article reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He constantly kept talking about this. I will forward this post to him.
    Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!
    wave arts crack
    driver booster pro license key
    sure cuts a lot pro crack
    vdownloader crack latest version full keygen

    ReplyDelete
  8. quickbooks login is a business accounting software developed to promote the growth and productivity of any business and provide automation of many business tasks that could otherwise be really time-consuming and tedious to finish.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When I first commented,
    I clicked the "Notify me when new comments are added" checkbox, and now every time I comment
    added I received four emails with the same comment.
    Is there do you want to get people out of that job? Thanks!
    dvdfab player crack
    driverdoc crack
    bootstrap studio crack
    serato dj pro crack

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for writing one of the best articles I have ever read. Your content is completely unique and different from other websites,.
    Thank you for sharing and good luck with future comments.
    utorrent portable crack
    windows 7 crack
    winrar crack

    ReplyDelete
  11. Amazon Prime Video allows clients to download their top shows and videos to view later. This option is great for clients who want to enjoy Amazon Prime Video in disconnected mode. If you have registered your devices using amazon.com/mytv, you will be able to view the downloaded videos immediately on your device. Follow the below steps to download your top-rated videos from Amazon Prime Video.amazon code
    amazon.com/code
    lowe's gift card balance
    target gift card balance
    Target gift card balance

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is important to remember that Amazon Prime Video is not compatible with every streaming device. Perhaps this is due to the fact that Amazon Prime Video is still relatively new. The service is still available on many devices.
    netflix.com/activate
    amazon.com/redeem
    target.com/checkbalance
    target.com/checkbalance
    amazon.com/code

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sincerely, I am overjoyed to have discovered your website; I discovered you by mistake when conducting a Google search.
    for another reason, I'm still here to congratulate you on a well-written piece and
    A lovely site on the whole (and I adore the theme/design as well).
    I don't have time to watch everywhere right now, but I saw and added.
    I've subscribed to your RSS feeds, and if I have time, I'll return to
    Continue reading, and keep up the fantastic job.
    microsoft office 2016 crack
    microsoft office 2016 crack
    eset internet security crack

    ReplyDelete



  14. Whoah, your site is incredible; I enjoy reading your reminiscences.
    Keep up the wonderful job!
    As you can see, many people are hunting for this knowledge, and you may greatly assist them.
    little snitch crack
    little snitch crack
    microsoft office crack

    ReplyDelete