Tuesday, October 3, 2017
There Isn't Much to Say. And Not Much Point in Saying It.
Commission meetings are increasingly poorly attended these days. Last week, we had the second reading of the budget Ordinance, and I think Linda Dillon, Chuck Ross, and I were the audience. Tonight, we had the October Commission meeting. Maybe there were eight of us. At the beginning. When I left, there were about four. I've sat through plenty of bad and oppressive Commission meetings, but it's getting impossible to sit through these.
The bobbleheads were bobbling tonight. It was clear they didn't really even know about what they were agreeing with each other, but bobble in agreement they did. The first matter was a Resolution Roxy Ross introduced in support of federal sanctions imposed against the autocracy in Venezuela. I have to say that when I read the proposal, I rolled my eyes. This has nothing to do with BP, and it's a kind of clutter in the Agenda. Harvey Bilt felt it was important to make that point explicitly, and he voted against it. Jenny Johnson-Sardella couldn't support it, unless some of the language was adjusted. Tracy Truppman was resistant, but she was ultimately content with Jenny's insistence that something be changed. Will Tudor clearly couldn't have cared less, and seemed to know nothing about it. But when Roxy was challenged as to why this was our business, she pointed out that we have some BP residents who are Venezuelan or have Venezuelan connections, and since it's an international concern, we should get on board, too. Tracy was slightly mollified when she was reassured that the document Roxy presented was from the County, and not from Roxy. But all in all, the bobbleheads made way too much out of this and gave Roxy way too hard a time. But they passed it 4-1 (you show 'em, Harvey; you da man).
Then, it was our new driveway and swale Ordinance. It's new, because even though Tracy lamely tried to claim it wasn't her Ordinance, it was in fact hers and hers alone. She single-handedly rewrote the Ordinance the Code Review wrote, and which was then adjusted by the last Commission, in response to feedback from many residents, and which has consumed 2-3 years of Village time and attention. But Tracy has no use for anyone except herself, and she simply discarded the whole thing. Fortunately for Tracy, she has complete ownership of three other Village residents, who all happen to be on the Commission, and she simply forged ahead, rewriting, and lying about whose product this was. It was so obnoxious and insulting that Roxy Ross got up, gathered her things, and withdrew from the meeting. I mean really, what was the point in being there? Tracy plus three other stooges equals whatever Tracy wants it to equal. "Listening to residents?" The only BP resident to whom Tracy ever listens is Rhonda's housemate. And since hardly anyone bothers to attend meetings any more, Tracy can make up any story she likes about what some anonymous resident allegedly told her, and just do whatever she wants. Which is what she does.
The only other funny thing was from last week, when we had the budget meeting. For whatever nonsensical reason, Chester ("Doc") Morris made a special appearance specifically and explicitly for the purpose of thanking the Commission for hiring Grubbs, the company that did part of our hurricane clean-up. I think Chester thought he was thanking those five Commissioners for having hired Grubbs. But it was the last Commission that made the contract with Grubbs, and Roxy Ross is the only remaining member of that Commission. If you think Tracy or anyone else corrected Chester, and told him they were glad he was satisfied, but they weren't the ones to thank (except Roxy), you can forget it. I'm telling you... Truppman, Trump... Coincidence?
Come to think about it, there was one other comical thing from tonight. While Tracy was trying to explain why the driveway/swale Ordinance should be written whatever way she wanted to write it, she got someone to acknowledge that there were 12 properties completely out of compliance with what was everyone's plan (until tonight). She wanted to write an Ordinance that would satisfy those 12 properties. As they were discussing this, Tracy and two of her dopes agreed with each other about writing an Ordinance that wouldn't threaten those 12 properties, and then they all looked at the other bobblehead: Will. Will couldn't speak. He probably wasn't sure what to say. He couldn't admit that he should at least recuse himself (knowing his pals would cover him anyway), and he couldn't disclose. His is one of the 12 properties that was never in compliance, and his sister-in-law's is another. The fact is that preventing the Village from making him put a driveway on his property is the one and only reason Will ever wanted to be on the Commission. And there it was, the table set for him. He could have been graceful and open about it. He was going to get his way anyway. But no.
I just about got whiplash from the driveway discussion at the meeting. Wow... where did that come from?? Very disappointing.
ReplyDeleteAt some point you realize you are wasting your breath.
ReplyDeleteAnd here I am busting my ass to add a driveway to my little blue house lot...and the commissioners prop gets an exception? Ugh, I want this to be over
ReplyDeleteI agree with Chuck.. but it is sad when neither the P&Z or the CRB have not been consulted as to what is wrong or right with the current driveway code. Why not consult with those who actually know the code.
ReplyDeleteOf course if Tracy decided to rewrite the code it needs to go to the boards, there are a number of significant changes she has introduced. Her version has supplanted the proposed ord. that the boards worked on. That's one of the reasons Rox walked out of the meeting.
ReplyDeleteChuck,
DeleteWhat Tracy has been showing us is that she doesn't "need" to do anything. She does what she wants. She has three other Commissioners who simply and stupidly enable her. Tracy has no sense of order, respect, appreciation for protocol or the history of the Village or anyone else's roles and contributions. I liken her to Donald Trump for a reason. The only real difference between the two of them is that Trump doesn't own Congress, and they can buck or frustrate him. Tracy does own a majority of the current Commission, and they're not disposed to confront her. One of them, although an attorney herself, and someone who served on an important Village Board, has reason to know better and to have more perspective, but she simply folds all the time. For all I know, Tracy made a pact with her, promising to work to get her elected in exchange for blind obedience. Another has no knowledge of the Village, no interest in the Village, and no role or agenda. He just took advantage of the possibility to get elected (maybe including a deal like the one I just speculated) for the purpose of stopping the Village from making him put in the driveway he's refused to install for the 14 years he's lived here. The last only ran, because he thought he had a sure thing this time, and he has no identifiable agenda, either. He seems rarely to have real depth of understanding about Village issues and the dynamics involved.
Those of us who don't like it need to get out of the way. First, it seemed like the Kuhls who stopped coming to meetings. Now, very few people come. Because what's the point? Just to helplessly watch it happen? Or to bear witness? It's frustrating and demoralizing. Tracy and her stooges unceremoniously ejected Sharon, and everyone who supported her hiring (which was very nearly all of us), and now they're ignoring all of us in every other way.
It's really bad, and there is no sense of public process. The four of them come to meetings reading the same script, and the rest of us be damned.
Fred
The Kuhls, by the way, used to complain about Steve Bernard and Bryan Cooper, but they always came to meetings. Then, they complained about Bryan, Barbara Watts, and Noah Jacobs, but they came to meetings. Then, they complained about me, but they came to meetings. Now, they've quit coming to meetings. Something different is happening now. This is a very different Commission. It's different from when Cooper, Watts, and Jacobs were a majority, and frustrated us by doing whatever they wanted, regardless of what we wanted. There's something more demoralizing and maybe more destructive about this Commission. And Tracy set the tone from the outset, when she showed us clearly that no one else mattered, and she assassinated Sharon Ragoonan. Now, we saw it again with the driveway/swale Ordinance, and Tracy's complete dismissal of Rox. You saw and heard Rox's explanation of why she was leaving, and the painfully conspicuous lack of any attempt to engage her from Tracy. Tracy's reaction was essentially, "good, now we don't have to bother with you and your meaningless attempts to contribute." At least Cooper/Watts/Jacobs flinched a time or two. These four don't flinch. They're a juggernaut, and they're out to destroy.
DeleteFred
It's the Tracy Effect.
ReplyDeleteMilt,
DeleteI'm not sure I understand what point you're making. Specifically, I'm not sure whether you mean your comment in a "positive" way or a "negative" way. You might mean that you like the direction in which Tracy is going, whatever direction that is, or that you in some sense agree with me, and you don't like what Tracy is doing. And by the way, the other point I've tried to make is that there is no "Tracy Effect" without reliable obsequiousness from her three stooges.
But coming back to the ambiguity of your comment, if you don't approve of what Tracy and the stooges are doing, then I'm puzzled. You were a leader last year in the "anyone but Fred" movement. "Anyone but Fred" at that time meant either Tracy and her slate of two stooges, or it meant Dan Samaria and any two of the other three. No disrespect to Dan, but I don't think most people gave him much of a chance to be elected. If you didn't think he'd get elected, then you wanted Tracy, Jenny, and Will. So you got exactly what you wanted.
So what's your complaint? To be honest with you, I didn't really campaign, because I didn't want to "win." My reason for running was to offer to save the Village from Tracy/Jenny/Will. I said so, and I explained exactly why I saw the "three-pack" as a very big problem. What I anticipated, and clearly described, was precisely what happened. I would like to give you credit for being intelligent and perspicacious enough to have been able to anticipate this as well as I did.
If you knew this was what would happen, and it happened exactly as you and I knew it would, then what's your gripe? You should be very satisfied. You should say "Yay! It's the Tracy Effect!!" Is that what you meant?
Fred
Fred, thanks for posting this topic on your blog. After reading your original post about the commission meeting, I emailed the village multiple times to press for a link to the video faster than normal. I posted that link on Nextdoor, watched it in dismay (if not shock) myself, and I include it here for anyone who hasn't viewed it yet.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcjDHXjEM0c&feature=youtu.be
First, I'll paraphrase what you said to Milt: "We got exactly what we (should have) expected, and quite frankly, deserve."
Stepping away from the one particularly ugly detail (Will Tudor basically being exempt, in Tracy's plan, from installing a driveway himself), the bigger problem is that the mayor is trying to legislate myopically, considering only how this ordinance will effect the tip of our collective noses without an understanding or appreciation that the decisions they make regarding land use have far-reaching implications and live on for generations. I lost count of how many times the mayor says things like, "This will impose an undue burden on specific property owners" instead of, "This is how it will impact BP as a community now and into the future." She is proposing decisions for specific property owners (those holding us back, if we're being honest), including one specific commissioner. (At what point those two may have decided that was a good thing, pre- or post-election, we can't be certain.)
Tracy's lack of vision, and her inability to even understand what "vision" means and how that would actually help her accomplish more, is staggering. At a recent strategy session she held, I tried to explain that any successful organization has a vision from which decisions and choices emanate, and her engineer's brain couldn't even fathom that concept. I made the mistake of also using the word "brand," and green pea soup spewed from her throat and heads spun on shoulders throughout the room.
If Biscayne Park were like unincorporated Miami-Dade or the countless other South Florida communities with no real potential to be special or better (and, speaking as an ugly capitalist, worth more money), or if Biscayne Park were past the point of no return like our neighbor, North Miami (where I lived for 14 years, so I'm allowed to say it's a corrupt shithole, kinda like I can say my Mom's a bitch but you can't), I could shrug off Tracy and her impotent minions more easily. But the sad truth is that Biscayne Park "could," "should," but won't with Tracy & Co. at the helm. It just ain't in her.
Fred..thanks for your complete update on the park. It seems to me that there have not been any change on the operation, Commissioners only reach out to residents when is time to vote, typical of politics, little pro-action. I would like to see improvements on the park, the medias, so many trees down after the hurricane...in front of my house there were 3 down..Is BP thinking on replace them? Oaks? or maybe soon we will need to re-name this village with another name " Biscayne Park"..Is not looking like a park any more. In the other hand, I always see improvements on Miami Shores (antique Lamp posts, nice manicure parks and medias) I guess that their residence choose well the people that is in charge.
ReplyDeleteI went once to one of the meetings, and beside that it was very depressing and boring meeting, did not have any interesting in commenting to the people that were sitting behind the tables..Just a quick reminder...You are there for the only reason to SERVE!, those that forgot that should step down!
regards,
Gina Lux
940 NE 116th St
BP Fl. 33161
Gina,
DeleteIt's a curious thing that you're commenting on a post, or even bothering to see one, that's three months old. I get notices of new comments, but no one else will see your comment.
In any event, let me first apologize for having been one of those Commissioners who walked around, and tried to meet and talk to a lot of Village residents when I was running, then didn't continue to do that after I was elected. Running for office, even in BP, is a very time-consuming task, and no one would be able to keep it up after the election. Maybe someone who was retired and had little to do could keep "making the rounds," but most people couldn't. Even some of the new Commissioners, who promised in what turned out to be an insincere and empty way to continue to walk around to talk to neighbors, don't do it. I don't fault them for not doing it. I fault them for foolishly claiming they would. They saw what it took to campaign. They knew they couldn't do that again.
There have been changes in operations here. Functioning in the Park has stopped since the new Commission took office. Only two things have happened. One is that we have gotten more caught up on our fiscal paperwork, which would have happened anyway, and the other is that we have had a hurricane that had to be dealt with. No one was exactly responsible for the delays-- there was an unusual amount of debris from Irma, and not at all only here in BP, and it took time to get it cleared away-- but the new Mayor did possibly compromise our ability to get reimbursed for the money we spent clearing it away. It remains to be seen how much jeopardy she caused us by not getting proper consensus and not making proper application to the state. Apart from that, the Village is doing nothing. We have lots to do, certainly including planting, but the Commission now in charge is not interested in any of it.
As for your block, I'm not sure which trees came down. Were they Australian pines? Of course we would like to replace downed trees with new trees. And they won't be Australian pines. Oaks? Maybe. Probably. You should communicate with the Village manager, and if you like, I'll come by and take a look with you. I can help you make your statement and argument.
I don't know what meeting you attended, but they're awful now. Some people who used to come faithfully don't come any more. And yes, of course you're right. This is all about serving the public. Some Commissioners think it's just about serving themselves.
Fred
PS: Great to hear from you, Gina.
Hello Fred:
ReplyDeleteI'm not attacking anyone in particular, I'm just saying that when it's election time everyone is the most pleasant to win votes, but when is time to take action there is no one who does, pure bureaucracy and politics prevails.
But nevertheless I must congratulate all the staff because they cleaned the park effectively and quickly, but the fallen ancestral trees have not being replaced, We need the shade they provide for we the humans that live in the park, for the birds, squirrels, iguanas and other creatures that are part of the park as well.
In the media in front of my house, there were a big gigantic tree, it was there 30 yrs ago, and I think it was part of the park from the beginning..It was seating at the end of the media, exactly like the one that is now standing at the other end of the same media..The space for a big pretty tree is there, It should be replace ASAP in order to be big and grow quickly. I just think that there should be more attention to the Manicure, the Lamp Posts, the medias, side walks in the park...for example, in one of the corners of the park they try to do a Brick corner? but then you left the other 3 other corners without the same treatment? who design that? a man? cause does not make sense, nor is balanced, it looks ugly and undone..anyway..you can show my complaint to whoever is in charge in the park. I really do not know anyone beside you.
regards,
I am commenting on this becasue it was today I got the link into my email. I thought It was a " Brand new newsletter" retarded action... ;)
ReplyDelete